From: David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 02:34:55PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
He is _trying_ to be DFSG-compliant but his license is mis-worded.
Someone should contact him.
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I've read, Donald Knuth doesn't work on internet time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
When I first looked at that license, I didn't see the Donald Knuth and
assumed that license was written by some completely clue-less person.
It's extremely ambiguous in that the changes are only permissible does
not actually grant any rights - it just
There's got to be someone at Stanford who can get to him.
Bruce
Bruce Perens wrote:
He is _trying_ to be DFSG-compliant but his license is mis-worded.
Someone should contact him.
This is Donald Knuth we're talking about -- he's not easy to contact.
I don't think the license is a problem anyhow, here's my analyis.
This file may be freely copied and
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:14:15AM +, Mike Goldman wrote:
I don't think the license is a problem anyhow, here's my analyis.
... which does not address the two specific points I raised in my
original mail. I am not convinced.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] %
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:14:15AM +, Mike Goldman wrote:
I don't think the license is a problem anyhow, here's my analyis.
... which does not address the two specific points I raised in my
original mail. I am not convinced.
Well, it *does* address the
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:02:21AM +, Mike Goldman wrote:
Well, it *does* address the issue of modified works. Either call it something
other than MMIXware, or distribute pristine source plus patches.
Where does it say anything about distributing modified works? It just
says that
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:02:21AM +, Mike Goldman wrote:
Well, it *does* address the issue of modified works. Either call it
something
other than MMIXware, or distribute pristine source plus patches.
Where does it say anything about distributing
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:59:53AM +, Mike Goldman wrote:
If
we're required to take a position that absence of explicit grant to distribute
binaries is denial of the right, you may be correct
That's how modern copyright operates. Everything is denied until
explicitly allowed.
This is
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 21:37:13 -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
There's got to be someone at Stanford who can get to him.
See http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/email.html for contact
details.
Ray
--
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 21:37:13 -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
There's got to be someone at Stanford who can get to him.
See http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/email.html for contact
details.
Yes, but to wait 3 months for a response to a snail mail request
11 matches
Mail list logo
