A while back, it was stated that mpeg-1 layer 3 encoders couldn't be
packaged. I see that libavifile has a libmp3lame_audioenc that doesn't
appear to invoke an external lame binary. Has Debian's policy on layer 3
encoders changed?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[I'm probably repeating myself, but this is for the benefit of debian-legal
readers and may help to shorten discussion]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 16:10:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> could someone please tell me if this patch:
> - contains any code with legal problems (e.g. patents)?
Not that I'm a
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:44:17AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > I will keep contact. Maybe you will see contrib packages based on the SAP
> > > DB source a
Hi,
could someone please tell me if this patch:
- contains any code with legal problems (e.g. patents)?
- forces the package to go to non-US?
If none of the above is true I'll apply this patch to the Debian
util-linux package.
Thanks in advance for your answers
Adrian
PS: Please Cc me because I
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I know for books, the copyright on the collection as a whole (including
> > cover art, etc) is separate from the copyright on the individual stories.
> > I assume this is similar.
>
> This is true, and related to the case. But the copyright on t
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:44:17AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > I will keep contact. Maybe you will see contrib packages based on the SAP
> > DB source and the Binary Build Environemnt before you will see DFSG
> > compliant pa
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:44:17AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> I will keep contact. Maybe you will see contrib packages based on the SAP DB
> source and the Binary Build Environemnt before you will see DFSG compliant
> packages.
Packages in contrib have to be dsg free. Non-dfsg free software g
Hello,
to update you on the progress of the SAP DB Packages:
I got answer from a nice guy at SAP about the problem of the Open Source
Ness of the Build Environment:
(copyed it to deian-email, but it is german)
- SAP is not giving out the code for the Build environment since they dont
wanted to
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I know for books, the copyright on the collection as a whole (including
> > cover art, etc) is separate from the copyright on the individual stories.
> > I assume this is similar.
>
> This is true, and related to the case. But the copyright on the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> I'm almost sure I'm not wrong. The GPL has some problems which makes
> it incompatibel with a lot of open source-licenses and the BSD-derived
> licenses has not this problem.
There are two advertising related clauses in the tradition
Hi
On Mon, 09 Apr 2001, LinuxLand / Hans-Jörg Ehren wrote:
> That copyright only reflects to packaging, artwork etc. The content
> ist still free software, no question.
That sounds OK.
> > Another strange thing is the impressum in the manual shipped with
> > the CDs, saying:
> >
> > The co
Jun Yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am interested becoming a new maintainer and packaging ggobi,a data
>visualization system for high-dimensional data. Its license indicates the
>following:
>
> Package License
> stand-alone ggobi AT&T Op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Clause 3 and 4 imposes restrictions on the software not found in the
> > GPL, which makes GPL incompatible with this license. BSD licenses has
> > no such problems.
>
> I'm almost sure you are inco
13 matches
Mail list logo
