Hi Steve, hi d-legal!
On 2004-03-08 12:59 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
[CC:ed to debian-legal, for sanity checking]
Sounds reasonable ;-)
If the website is down, how would anyone be able to verify that your
.orig.tar.gz is pristine source, either?
I guess only by comparing it to the
Don Armstrong wrote:
It is defined somewhere.
See http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html question 8.
Do you think we should perhaps try to get a link from
http://www.debian.org/devel to this (and perhaps the various other
documents which have been assembled, such as Manoj's huge page on
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
Arvind Autar said on Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:41:36PM +0100,:
library is licensed under the Ada Community License. I already found
a thread which talks about whether it's allowed or not.
That thread is not clear to me.
The Ada Community License, taken
posted mailed
selussos wrote:
That possibly could be your own _personal_ prejudice which is
understandable but I think that U.S. Copyright is fairly well
deployed throughout this world and is internationally recognized.
Perhaps you might not understand the way international copyright works;
I'm going to try to be clear about where debian-legal is coming from.
We've gotten a lot more careful about licenses in recent years after being
burned several times by surprising license interpretations. And by people
trying to do odd, non-free things with their copyright licenses (usually
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
It is defined somewhere.
See http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html question 8.
Do you think we should perhaps try to get a link from
http://www.debian.org/devel to this (and perhaps the various other
documents
posted mailed
Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[Please Cc me on replies since I'm not subscribed to d-legal]
Hi,
I'm adopting the spamprobe package which is under the QPL (Qt public
license). The package has a broken configure.in script that results
in linking against libdb3.so even when
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040309 16:40]:
Yeah, what would probably be best is to setup a
http://www.debian.org/licenses or http://www.debian.org/legal/ to both
archive our license decisions and provide a place to stick the FAQ and
links to relevant decisions|commentary.
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
The Ada Community License
Copyright(C) 1997 David G. Weller
Permission to redistribute in unmodified form is granted,
all other rights reserved.
This appears to
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:59:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
d) Make other distribution arrangements with the Copyright
Holder.
Not useful for Debian unless we do so. ;-)
You and I both know that Debian cannot make local distribution
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:26:01PM -0500, Simon Law wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:59:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
d) Make other distribution arrangements with the Copyright
Holder.
Not useful for Debian unless we do so. ;-)
11 matches
Mail list logo
