-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
| Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|
|Glenn Maynard wrote:
|
|
|On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:02:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
|
|The main author of Plex86 forked his own project (heh) to create the
|new Plex86
Hi all,
I'm the maintainer of the brutefir package and I received the mail
below from Anders Torger, author of BruteFIR.
Please could you answer to his question?
Thanks,
Free Ekanayaka
PS: as me and Anders are not subscribed to debian-legal, please just
keep us in Cc: when replying
On 2004-04-10 10:01:03 +0100 Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please could you answer to his question?
I am not sure what question you mean, because I couldn't see it in the
forwarded email.
For the question in the subject line: I still think that OSL 2.0 is
not DFSG-free because
Is the following license (not subject to copyright and in the public
domain) free? I think it is. However, I would like to see if there is
any objection.
* Template Numerical Toolkit (TNT): Linear Algebra Module
*
* Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division
* National Institute of
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2004-04-10 10:01:03 +0100 Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please could you answer to his question?
I am not sure what question you mean, because I couldn't see it in the
forwarded email.
I think it was whether or not it would pass the DFSG, so
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the following license (not subject to copyright and in the public
domain) free? I think it is. However, I would like to see if there is
any objection.
Nope, public domain stuff is perfectly fine. Just include this so that
there's no
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| So, looking at the decision of the Gaiman/McFarlane case, that doesn't
| appear to be the case: despite the sequential nature of comic book
| production (storyine - script - editor - art - publication), the
| characters were regarded as very clear
On Saturday 10 April 2004 11.51, you wrote:
To me, the easiest course would be to issue seperate copyright and
patent licences which do not interact. We could then considers them
individually without playing hunt the interaction and people in
swpat-free areas (including Sweden for now?) may be
MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MJ On 2004-04-10 10:01:03 +0100 Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ wrote:
Please could you answer to his question?
MJ I am not sure what question you mean, because I couldn't see
MJ it in the forwarded email.
MJ For the question
On Friday 09 April 2004 02:26, Glenn Maynard wrote:
As I recall, lots of them said on strike, with an obscure (but click
here for the webpage) link. It was a stupid idea, since lots of people
(myself included) often missed the link and figured the page was simply
offline.
Sorry for the
10 matches
Mail list logo