Home delivery Meds

2004-11-19 Thread Hope Helms
Your favorite medcation ~ 70% 0FF Sa1e (limitd. time only) V1AGRA from $60 VALlUM from $70 AMB1EN from $69 C1ALlS from $97 XANX from $76 + MORE... 0RDER NOW GET SHIPPlNG AT NO C0ST http://806.net.besentby.com

Re: GPL compatible license?

2004-11-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Not sure if this is possible but would it be fine when modified to read: 3. Furthermore, if you distribute Elm software or parts of Elm, with or without additions developed by you or others, then you must make available

Post to gentoo-gwn@robin.gentoo.org denied

2004-11-19 Thread gentoo-gwn+owner
Hi, this is the mlmmj program managing the mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sorry to inform you that Your mail could not be delivered to the list. Your mail was rejected because it matched a rule set up by the list administrator. Thanks.

Re: GPL compatible license?

2004-11-19 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Not sure if this is possible but would it be fine when modified to read: 3. Furthermore, if you distribute Elm software or parts of Elm, with or without additions developed by you or others,

Re: GPL compatible license?

2004-11-19 Thread Matthew Garrett
Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since the GPL has the three year clause, adding a for a minimum of three years in the above should fit as well, right? I don't think Debian-legal accepts that clause as free. That is, the GPL is regarded

Re: o'reilly

2004-11-19 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Broadly speaking, referring to a work is not something that is protected by copyright law. Several courts have ruled that some kinds of deep linking to a part of someone's web site constitutes copyright infringement. Other

Re: GPL compatible license?

2004-11-19 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since the GPL has the three year clause, adding a for a minimum of three years in the above should fit as well, right? I don't think Debian-legal accepts that