Don Armstrong wrote:
I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of
the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters.
Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters are
actually midnight blue ;-)
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:40:02AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of
the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters.
Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters are
Hi all,
Kissfft (http://kissfft.sf.net) ships with a modified BSD license
that says:
/*
Copyright (c) 2003-2004, Mark Borgerding
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, are permitted provided that the following
conditions are met:
Paul Brossier wrote:
Kissfft (http://kissfft.sf.net) ships with a modified BSD license
that says:
/*
Copyright (c) 2003-2004, Mark Borgerding
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, are permitted provided that the following
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
The text of this license is nearly identical to that in
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, modulo the different copyright holder
and the corresponding changes in the third clause and warranty
disclaimer. Oddly, it seems that name of
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
The text of this license is nearly identical to that in
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, modulo the different copyright holder
and the corresponding changes in the third clause and warranty
disclaimer. Oddly, it
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:22:56 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
Agreed. For the same reason, I wonder why one particular variant
(3-clause, copyright The Regents of the University of California) of
the BSD license is included in /usr/share/common-licenses, while the
standard MIT license is not.
You
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am concerned about is the following scenario:
Mr. John Wontshare writes a streaming multicast client.
To deal with packet loss, he uses my error-correcting library.
Without my library, Mr. Wontshare's client can't work at all.
That statement is
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
If your library has a well-specified API, anyone could make a library with the
same API, and his client could use that. Under those circumstances, his
client is not a derivative work of your library (although it may be a
derivative work of the *API and other
9 matches
Mail list logo
