Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
(The FSF's statements that linking with a library creates a derviative
work of the library confuse people; it may help to remember that this
only applies to the *binary image* created by the linkage, which contains
elements of the library, not
Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
(The FSF's statements that linking with a library creates a
derviative work of the library confuse people; it may help to
remember that this only applies to the *binary image* created by
the linkage,
Måns Rullgård wrote:
Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the correct term for a work that combines two other works,
created without creative input?
An anthology, or a compilation, I think.
From Title 17, Sec 101:
A ''collective work'' is a work, such as a periodical
I am concerned there might have been some confusion about terms here.
Code here can mean three things:
source code -- my copyrighted implementation of an:
error correcting code -- an algorithm I developed which operates on:
encoded data -- the data being transmitted in a
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 11:07:02AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
If it isn't creative, it isn't a work under copyright law. See, e.g.,
Fesit v. Rural Telephone Service, holdings (a) and (b).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=casecourt=USvol=499invol=340
A problem
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Måns Rullgård wrote:
Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the correct term for a work that combines two other works,
created without creative input?
An anthology, or a compilation, I think.
From Title 17, Sec 101:
A
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 05:20:46PM +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
What is a binary image? I think it makes most sense that it includes the
entire shipped product---both my executable and it's dependent: his.
Whether the library and binary form a single file seems irrelevant.
Otherwise,
Scripsit Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your library has a well-specified API, anyone could make a library with
the same API, and his client could use that.
I am perfectly fine with this.
If he uses someone else's source code to implement my API, so be it.
Of course, that new
8 matches
Mail list logo
