Quoting Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:38:01PM -0500, Mark Johnson wrote:
I've been asked to get some sort of review from the free software world of
the new OASIS[1] IPR draft. I tried to review it myself, but the legalese
is a bit on the opaque side for
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:55:04PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
Great. Then the driver operates differently depending on the presence
of additional software -- it needs a Linux kernel and the firmware.
So can you say why
it is a problem with my license, and not with Apache's and PHP's?
Nobody is going to say that, because we think it's a problem with all those
licenses.
It was a problem with Apache's license. It was not noticed for a long time.
Eventually it was noticed, and it was *fixed*
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
That's not software. That's firmware, at best -- you can look at it
as software, but then you don't get to distribute any drivers. It is
also internally consistent to think of chips as hardware and
distribute drivers
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 17:09:38 -0500 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Consider adding the following to the summary under trademark
restrictions:
Debian-legal has contacted Creative Commons about this issue, since it
seems to be trivial to fix, but has unfortunately received no
response.
Perhaps
5 matches
Mail list logo
