Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 00:21:39 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
Do you think that figuring out the LaTeX markup by looking at the
resulting PDF is easy?
As a practical example of this, Python ships HTML documentation. This
is in a pre-built tarball in the Debian source package,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:05:52AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:17:50AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
* Package name: tinywm
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Nick Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://incise.org/
* License
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:09:56 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
* latex2html is released under the GPL and moved to main.
The author has already said he would do this with the next version,
but that next version may be a long time off; the best solution would
be a permission statement.
Wow! :-)
I
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a (wishlist?) bug should be file against the latex2html package.
What do you think?
Such a good idea that Roland Stigge already did it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=221703
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:38:06 +1100, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:05:52AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:17:50AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
* Package name: tinywm
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Nick Welch
On 06 Mar 2005 14:41:23 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a (wishlist?) bug should be file against the latex2html
package. What do you think?
Such a good idea that Roland Stigge already did it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=221703
Well,
7 matches
Mail list logo