> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:18:11PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> > Well that's the problem. While copyright law does permit
> > you to restrict
> > the right to create derivative works, it doesn't permit you to
> > restrict the
> > distribution of lawfully created derivative works to licensees
> > The GPL applies to distributing a Linux binary I just made even
> > though nobody ever chose to apply the GPL to the binary I just made
> > only because the binary I just made is a derivative work of the
> > Linux kernel, and the authors of that work chose to apply the GPL to
> > it.
> How ca
On Sunday 10 April 2005 01:18 pm, David Schwartz wrote:
> You could do that be means of a contract, but I don't think you could it
> do by means of a copyright license. The problem is that there is no right
> to control the distribution of derivative works for you to withhold from
> me.
and
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:18:11PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> Well that's the problem. While copyright law does permit you to restrict
> the right to create derivative works, it doesn't permit you to restrict the
> distribution of lawfully created derivative works to licensees of the
> or
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:10:43AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > After a *lot* of discussion, it was deliberated on d-l that
>> > this is not that tricky at all, and that the "mere
>> > aggregation" clau
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:56:50AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Yes I would. Linking forms a tighter coupling than just placing the
>> two parts side by side on a filesystem designed for general storage of
>> byte streams. There is more to say about t
Scripsit "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> However, then you cannot legally copy it at all, because it contains
>> part of the original author's copyrighted work and therefore can only
>> legally be copied with the permission of the author.
> The way you stop someone from distributing
Scripsit Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> >Yes I would. Linking forms a tighter coupling than just
> >placing the two parts side by side on a filesystem designed
> >for general storage of byte streams. There is more to say
> >about the situation than the naked fact
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:29:58 -0300 Humberto Massa wrote:
> my suggestion:
>
> You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly
> perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with
> any technological measures that prevent the recipient
> from exercising the rig
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I got email from Lawrence Lessig this week that their new general
> counsel, Mia Garlick, has been reviewing the debian-legal summary and
> will have a response for us by 8 April.
So, another update: I got email from LL on Friday.
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:07:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> > The way you stop someone from distributing part of your
> > work is by arguing
> > that the work they are distributing is a derivative work of
> > your work and
> > they had no right to *make* it in the first place. See, fo
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:42:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Every book in my book shelf is software?
>
> If you digitalize it, yes.
AFAIK software only refers to programs, not to arbitrary sequences of
bytes. An MP3 file isn't "software". Although it surely isn't hardware
either.
--
Giusepp
12 matches
Mail list logo
