Re: cl-typesetting license

2005-04-16 Thread Jakob Bohm
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:09:18PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 16:32 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > > Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > > > > > > >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required t

Re: (DRAFT 3) FAQ on documentation licensing

2005-04-16 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
O Sábado, 16 de Abril de 2005 ás 18:49:15 +0200, Francesco Poli escribía: > Here I don't know if it's me that sees it wrong or that symbol is really > a question mark... > I would do > s/components \? the/components: the/ That's a dash (—), that does not appear well because I cut-and-pasted fr

Re: (DRAFT 3) FAQ on documentation licensing

2005-04-16 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:18:45 +0200 Jacobo Tarrio wrote: > A: It is included because this text contains the terms under which > many components of a Debian system are distributed. Debian is legally > required, then, to inform of these terms to the receiver of the > components ? the only way is incl

Re: cl-typesetting license

2005-04-16 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 16:32 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > > > > >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to > > >confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the >

Re: cl-typesetting license

2005-04-16 Thread Jakob Bohm
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > > >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to > >confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the > >library. So to me it looks basically just like something like