PC stuff for all your needs.

2005-05-22 Thread Lelia
Delete you PC's low profile. http://YSWPydlvMUejqg7wtlae98ripoqa7.wafddiwafd8.com/?gayfalawzzlqqhfh Lelia

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-22 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 22 May 2005 05:58:41 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: QPL is usually considered free, but its use is discouraged. Wait, the QPL (with no additional permission and a choice of venue) is *not* DFSG-free (many long discussions were hold on debian-legal last summer, IIRC). Based on what has

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-22 Thread Matthew Garrett
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wait, the QPL (with no additional permission and a choice of venue) is *not* DFSG-free (many long discussions were hold on debian-legal last summer, IIRC). There's disagreement over that. Based on what has been stated and on

Re: RES: What makes software copyrightable anyway?

2005-05-22 Thread Michael K. Edwards
This one's long because it contains excerpts from the cases Raul cited along with (hopefully sufficiently polite) rebuttals of his interpretations. On 5/21/05, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/21/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lotus, actually, has been heard in court.

Re: RES: What makes software copyrightable anyway?

2005-05-22 Thread Raul Miller
On 5/22/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This one's long because it contains excerpts from the cases Raul cited along with (hopefully sufficiently polite) rebuttals of his interpretations. Thanks. Also, I should have acknowledged that I'd forgotten about the Louts v Bourland

Re: RES: What makes software copyrightable anyway?

2005-05-22 Thread Raul Miller
One other thing I should note about the GPL reasoning in the Progress v. MySQL case. In her assessment that no harm was likely, the judge could have been considering that Progress would be estopped from pursuing infringement charges against people releasing derivatives of Gemini under the GPL.

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-22 Thread MJ Ray
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I think a bug should be filed immediately... Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what the not-on-legal part

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-22 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote: Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what the not-on-legal part of the project think about these sort of issues. Have you had a chance to outline this