On Feb 24, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, no need to teach me. But what are you trying to say? Or are you
That your change is a deliberate DMCA violation (circumvention of
technological measures).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Sat, Feb 25 2006, 10:15:11AM]:
Ehm... Sorry, would you please read the license you are talking about?
You did not even copy it to the report.
slmodem-2.9.9e-pre1a/COPYING
/*
*
*Copyright (c) 2001, Smart Link Ltd.
*All rights reserved.
On 2/25/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, no need to teach me. But what are you trying to say? Or are you
That your change is a deliberate DMCA violation (circumvention of
technological measures).
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
The drivers do not load. They compile fine, but they do not load
because some kernel developers think that they must throw stones
into way of users (for whose sake?!).
I have set the MODULE_LICENSE string to Dual BSD/GPL because I
honestly think
On 2/25/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
exist. Md raised his voice and he has a point, though a DMCA-threat in
GPL context looks slightly absurd.
Slightly?!
-
The authentication sequence, it is true, may well block one form of
access—the ability to . . . make use of the
#include hallo.h
* Alexander Terekhov [Sat, Feb 25 2006, 10:06:11PM]:
On 2/25/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
exist. Md raised his voice and he has a point, though a DMCA-threat in
GPL context looks slightly absurd.
Slightly?!
-
The authentication sequence, it is
On 2/25/06, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Next, the presence of the binary blobs, if they're actually needed,
preclued this work from being compatible with the GPL.
Sez who?
The last I heard Moglen freed blobs. The Prof in GNU Law declared
them to be fully resistant to the
7 matches
Mail list logo
