* Peter Eisentraut:
Marc Dequènes wrote:
The documentation is released under the GPL and from my understanding
the GPL requires that you keep the previous changelog entries.
I see no such requirement. If this were in fact true, we'd have a
billion license infringements all over the place.
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2][3].
This license,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to Fernando Lozano for bringing this to our attention over at the
JPackage list. Some issues came up that I would like to discuss with the
people here. You'll have to excuse me as I didn't even make it to (2f)
before finding some problems with
[For -legal people, the license is attached.]
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Could someone please explain to me why paragraph 2(f) does not pose a
problem? I couldn't find ANY discussion about the license on Debian legal
which surprises me a little bit, but then maybe I just missed the
relevant parts of the
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Did you read the accompanying FAQ? Question 12 addresses your concern.
http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.1.txt
I did, but I wasn't sure if that FAQ has any legal meaning. I have
problems seeing that the FAQ answer fits with
Estimado señor:
Me llamo Pedro Alonso y las pasadas Navidades se publicó mi primer libro El
Silencio de Dios - Historias de Luz y Sabiduría.
Este libro es una recopilación de 80 historias tipo cuentos o fábulas con
moraleja, con un mensaje positivo.
El libro es un reflejo de mi web. Si
reopen 323099
thanks.
I don't agree that GR-2006-001 outcome makes this a non-bug.
AFAICS from the bug log, it seems that wget documentation
includes invariant sections: hence GR-2006-001 restates
its non-freeness.
P.S.:
I'm Cc:ing debian-legal, please keep Cc:ing it when replying
to the bug
We are releasing some software and would like to
make sure it is compatible with debian.
We have been told that this is the current license to
use for UC produced works.
http://www.ucop.edu/ott/permissn.html
I searched the archives to no avail. I notice
that it no longer includes the
On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:01:26 +0200 Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a
new license: the Operating
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:34 + Brian M. Carlson wrote:
[For -legal people, the license is attached.]
Thanks.
[...]
Also, section 4 poses a major issue. If, for any reason, the Linux
kernel doesn't do something that Java requires, then we are obligated
to either fix it or inform
kris wrote:
We are releasing some software and would like to
make sure it is compatible with debian.
We have been told that this is the current license to
use for UC produced works.
http://www.ucop.edu/ott/permissn.html
I searched the archives to no avail. I notice
that it no longer
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:24:50PM -0700, kris wrote:
We are releasing some software and would like to
make sure it is compatible with debian.
We have been told that this is the current license to
use for UC produced works.
http://www.ucop.edu/ott/permissn.html
I searched the archives
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello debian-legal,
I'm forwarding, with permission, parts of a message from Kern Sibbald,
author of Bacula and its manual. The current manual, which has a
license listed at http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/index.html, is not
DFSG-free. However, Kern has indicated a
On Wed, 17 May 2006 22:56:06 +0100 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:34 + Brian M. Carlson wrote:
[For -legal people, the license is attached.]
Thanks.
[...]
Also, section 4 poses a major issue. If, for any reason, the
Linux kernel
(Please cc me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to debian-legal. I think
this discussion is likely to be sadly short, but let me know if I really
need to subscribe for it.)
Several of us at Stanford have been looking at what would be involved to
package Shibboleth (an interinstitutional web
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
I'm forwarding, with permission, parts of a message from Kern Sibbald,
author of Bacula and its manual. The current manual, which has a
license listed at http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/index.html, is not
DFSG-free.
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 19:06 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
[[snipped]]
No, it's not. It doesn't grant the right to be used in commercial
products, and thus fails the DFSG.
I guess you mean that it does allow commercial licensing
and therefore is not compatible
kris wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 19:06 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
[[snipped]]
No, it's not. It doesn't grant the right to be used in commercial
products, and thus fails the DFSG.
I guess you mean that it does allow commercial licensing
and
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 21:11 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
[[snipped]]
OK.. now I am really confused.
No problem ;-). Let me try to help...
Below is the relevant text.
I read this as free for non-commercial use
Yes.
and non-free for commercial use.
Correct.
GNU GPL can't
Am Mittwoch, den 17.05.2006, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:
I don't agree that GR-2006-001 outcome makes this a non-bug.
AFAICS from the bug log, it seems that wget documentation
includes invariant sections: hence GR-2006-001 restates
its non-freeness.
Don explain the problem of this
Summary: The issue with wget.texi is that the GNU GPL is an Invariant
Section; since the GNU GPL cannot be modified anyway, this just forces
gpl.texi to always be distributed with wget.texi, even when you're
just distributing the manual.
The solution is to change with the Invariant Sections
22 matches
Mail list logo
