On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:51:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you distribute binary images with a magazine and have something in
that magazine saying if you want the source write to address with a
photocopy of this
Matthew Palmer writes (Re: Linux Magazin Germany, affecting Debian's image?!):
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you distribute binary images with a magazine and have something in
that magazine saying if you want the source write to address with a
photocopy
On 7/19/06, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:51:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you distribute binary images with a
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:51:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you distribute binary images with a magazine and have something in
that magazine saying if
Scripsit Robinson Tryon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My guess is that the lawyers who drafted the GPL knew or believed that
the courts would interpret such a written offer like a coupon: you
have to physically (or electronically, etc...) have a copy of that
particular written offer in order to redeem
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:43:40PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:51:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you distribute binary
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:38:24 -0400 Joe Smith wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And my favourite
# Yo yo, this be da socketNinja.
# Alpha-2.0 release
# Distribute and get a visit from tireIronNinja
which I don't think is free.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:38:37 +0100 James Westby wrote:
My analysis of The Metasploit Framework License v1.0 follows.
Executive summary
=
This license is definitely non-DFSG-free and should be avoided.
A work released under this license should not be distributed by Debian
(not
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scripsit Robinson Tryon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My guess is that the lawyers who drafted the GPL knew or believed that
the courts would interpret such a written offer like a coupon: you
have to physically (or
9 matches
Mail list logo
