El jueves, 26 de abril de 2007 a las 16:25:40 -0400, Jason Spiro escribía:
I have dropped Tommi, Sami and Joonas from the Cc because I don't think
they want to be bothered too much with this kind of things, and only care
about the results. Feel free to correct me if that isn't the case.
*
On Thu Apr 26 21:16, Jason Spiro wrote:
I don't know much about how to write licenses, and this is the first
one I have ever written. I figured that everything after the subject
to the following conditions: would automatically override the initial
permissions I gave. I guess I was wrong?
Sorry if you get this Message twice, but my Previously messages does
not appear in the archives and it seems to be lost...
Am 2007-04-11 00:24:19, schrieb Francesco Poli:
So, IIUC, ready-to-use videos are created by extracting and compressing
appropriate sequences of the original uncompressed
The author of Ion3 (which I maintain) is proposing to introduce a new
licence[1] which includes the clause:
3. Redistributions of this software accessible plainly with a name
of this software (ion, ion3, etc.), must provide the latest
release with a reasonable delay from its
2007/4/27, Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu Apr 26 21:16, Jason Spiro wrote:
I don't know much about how to write licenses, and this is the first
one I have ever written. I figured that everything after the subject
to the following conditions: would automatically override the
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think this would require a package name change. Any other opinion
on that?
That is what it looks like to me. Also, this clause
2. Altered versions must be clearly and explicitly marked as such,
and must not be misrepresented as being the
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:32 -0700, Ken Arromdee wrote:
What are you talking about?
Unless I'm mistaken, the topic is to consider a request for a GR that
would add language to the DFSG saying that licenses need not be
modifiable. :)
If by legal composition of copyright you mean license texts
On 27/04/07, Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The author of Ion3 (which I maintain) is proposing to introduce a new
licence[1] which includes the clause:
3. Redistributions of this software accessible plainly with a name
of this software (ion, ion3, etc.), must provide the latest
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 18:26 -0400, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
On 27/04/07, Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The author of Ion3 (which I maintain) is proposing to introduce a new
licence[1] which includes the clause:
3. Redistributions of this software accessible plainly with
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:15:51 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote:
Sorry if you get this Message twice, but my Previously messages does
not appear in the archives and it seems to be lost...
No problem, actually I've never received any other response...
Am 2007-04-11 00:24:19, schrieb Francesco
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:27:57 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
While I doubt I would have trouble updating the package within 28 days
of an upstream release, I doubt that Debian would like to commit to
that, and certainly the package would have to remain unreleased.
So I think this would
This one time, at band camp, Francesco Poli said:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:27:57 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
While I doubt I would have trouble updating the package within 28
days of an upstream release, I doubt that Debian would like to
commit to that, and certainly the package would
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:39:57 +0100 Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Francesco Poli said:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:27:57 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
While I doubt I would have trouble updating the package within 28
days of an upstream release, I doubt that Debian
13 matches
Mail list logo
