Francesco Poli wrote:
Bad: no clear definition of remote users
The term user is not clearly defined.
Is your point that it is impossible to clearly define, or do you have
alternative language?
Do you know how the corresponding clause in the current Affero license
has historically
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Incidentally, what part of the DFSG is the Dissident test supposed to
help test against?)
The imaginary clause.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Incidentally, what part of the DFSG is the Dissident test supposed
to help test against?)
URL:http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html#dissident
I believe it tests against DFSG§5, No Discrimination Against Persons
or Groups.
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
(if your version supports
such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source
of your version by providing access to copy the Corresponding Source
from a network server at no charge.
Bad: use
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:28 + Joe Nahmias wrote:
Hello -legal,
I recently came across Knowledgetree which is a web-based document
management system. There is a (very old) version of it currently in
Debian that is licensed under the GPL2. However, it seems that newer
versions are
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:24:43 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
(if your version supports
such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding
Source of your version by providing access to copy the
Corresponding Source
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:33:44 +0100 Gervase Markham wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Bad: no clear definition of remote users
The term user is not clearly defined.
Is your point that it is impossible to clearly define, or do you have
alternative language?
I cannot have
7 matches
Mail list logo
