On Friday 29 June 2007 00:36:43 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 28 juin 2007 à 10:24 +0200, Bruno Costacurta a écrit :
AFAICS you can use it legally if you port it to GNUTLS.
- the actual code implemented a strong separation layer between OpenSSL
and Qt (review of code can be made by
Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to package SLEPc eigenvalue solvers[0] into non-free, the
license is below. There is a line A modified version of the software
cannot be redistributed. The debian package can be built without
modificating the upstream sources though, so my
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:59:50AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I think the Anthony Towns DPLship was not a fun time for those trying
to fix legal bugs and it should have been ended sooner.
You know, beyond the initial offensiveness,
Permission to distribute binary packages at least. While you're asking,
why not ask for it as free software? Even one with an obnoxious ad
clause (so they get their attribution) would be an improvement.
Hope that helps,
That helps a lot. Thanks. I asked the upstream and they seem not to be
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:34:33 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 26 juin 2007 à 00:48 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:06:58 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
This is a bit more complicated. The QPL is DFSG-free, but only if
you don't apply section #6
This is
Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 00:36 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le jeudi 28 juin 2007 à 10:24 +0200, Bruno Costacurta a écrit :
AFAICS you can use it legally if you port it to GNUTLS.
- the actual code implemented a strong separation layer between OpenSSL and
Qt
(review of code
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:17:10 +0100 Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
In 2006, we had:
- a resolution on the DFSG-free status of the GFDL
Where the winning option legislated without *any explanation* that the
DFSG issues of the GFDL (except for the invariant-like ones) do not
exist.
This
retitle 431109 [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL
symlinks
thanks
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:04:02PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Following /usr/share/doc/base-files/FAQ, I'm reassigning this to
debian-policy.
Please read my email to debian-legal ad debian-policy
This proposal does essentialy two things:
- Disambiguate GPL/LGPL versioning requirement by extending it to any DFSG
compatible version the FSF may publish.
- Deprecate use of symlinks, since they're a source of problems (as exposed
by GPLv3, see
+ file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in
+ that directory since different, incompatible versions of these
+ licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation,
+ hence using the symlinks could lead to ambiguity.
I disagree with this.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
+ file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in
+ that directory since different, incompatible versions of these
+ licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation,
+ hence
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
+ file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in
+ that directory since different, incompatible versions of these
+ licenses have been published by
Hi all,
the final text of the GNU GPL v3 has been published on 29 June 2007 by
the FSF.
The plain text form can be downloaded from:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt
The main substantial changes with respect to the Last Call Draft
(discussed in the thread
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:47:59 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The full final text of the GNU GPL v3 is quoted below for reference.
My comments follow.
The usual disclaimers: IANAL, IANADD.
[...]
3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
[...]
When you convey a
(First: apologies. This message probably won't thread properly. This is
because I reading this list via Usenet, but because the Usenet gateway
is, I presume, one-way gateway, I have to reply via the list email
address. The trouble is my email client has no message to reply to,
because it's not my
15 matches
Mail list logo
