Hello,
To follow up on this: as of 5 September, Bacula source code is free of third
party copyrighted code that is GPLed. Doing so, did unfortunately create a
good deal of instability, which we are dealing with. However, for the future
(probably version 3.0.0), we will be able to use OpenSSL
Hi Kern
Kern Sibbald wrote:
As far as I can see, the project has the following ways to proceed:
1. Add a modification to our existing license that permits linking with
OpenSSL.
I think this is the simplest clause, and it keeps well within the
precedent already accepted by the Bacula
This one time, at band camp, Shane Martin Coughlan said:
Hi Kern
Kern Sibbald wrote:
As far as I can see, the project has the following ways to proceed:
1. Add a modification to our existing license that permits linking with
OpenSSL.
I think this is the simplest clause, and it keeps
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:48:17 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
that a requirement for precise
information on the copyright holder fails the Dissident Test.
I've not seen the Dissident test applied that way.
The Dissident test applies to
* Ben Finney:
(Please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct. I didn't ask
for personal copies of messages also sent to the list.)
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ben Finney:
If not, this does appear to me to be a policy bug. Such a bug must
be fixed either by
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ben Finney:
(Please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct. I didn't
ask for personal copies of messages also sent to the list.)
Florian, you've quoted this text but seem to have ignored it. Again,
please follow
6 matches
Mail list logo
