On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:04:43AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> For instance: from a quick glance, I couldn't find any permission to
> distribute modified versions of the specification (even under a
> different name). If there's no such permission, then the
> specification fails DFSG#3/DFSG#4 ...
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:48:42 + John Halton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:36:53AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I think that the original question was more about the DFSG-freeness
> > of the AMQP specification itself, rather than about the possibility
> > of developing DFSG-free program
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:36:53AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that the original question was more about the DFSG-freeness
> of the AMQP specification itself, rather than about the possibility
> of developing DFSG-free programs which follow the specification...
I'm not sure how one woul
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:08:36 + John Halton wrote:
> On 06/12/2007, John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I would like to ask if the following license meets the DFSG. Clause
> > ii of the license says that the license is terminated if you sue any
> > author.
>
> I don't think that in its
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:46:57 + John Halton wrote:
[...]
> As regards the AGPL web server and other similar
> hypotheticals, I think this would come down to user/community
> pressure: i.e. if someone chooses a licence that is impractical then
> either the software won't find many users, or the l
Hello there.
I ask for advise.
PHP uses its own OpenSource license which is incompatible with GPL for
some reasons.
eAccelerator[1] is a PHP extension which speeds up php scrips at 10
times and do some more things (content caching, session handling etc.)
But it is licensed under GPL and unfortun
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 06:44:52PM +0100, Lasse Reichstein Holst Nielsen wrote:
> So an interactive AGPL program *must* have a prominent way of giving
> information to the user. This breaks for any server where the return
> format is restricted (web servers should not insert content on
> delivered
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:40:43PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "John Halton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>
>>> 3. If they charge a fee for the CD-ROM or other media on which
>>> they deliver the Mugshot™ code, they warranty the media on
>>>
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:35:35 +0100, John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For now, as regards the "interaction" issue my inclination is to
assume that it is implicit in this that (a) we are talking about some
level of direct input/output interaction from the user's point of
view. i.e. softwar
On 06/12/2007, John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to ask if the following license meets the DFSG. Clause ii
> of the license says that the license is terminated if you sue any
> author.
I don't think that in itself makes the licence non-free (the CDDL
includes a similar provisio
I would like to ask if the following license meets the DFSG. Clause ii
of the license says that the license is terminated if you sue any
author.
The license appears at the top of the amqp specification downloaded
from:
https://jira.amqp.org/confluence/download/attachments/720900/amqp0-8.xml?versi
11 matches
Mail list logo
