Re: mined copyright with no copyright

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:31:47 -0300 Mauro Lizaur wrote: [...] > Well, the last time i contacted Thomas Wolff Thomas, IIUC, is the current maintainer of mined but not the (sole) copyright holder. Is that correct? > about this and he replied > with this: > --- > Hi Mauro, > I confirm there was no

Re: Bug#476644: bring back H.261 encoding

Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: ffmpeg > Severity: wishlist > Version: 0.svn20080206-1 > > Hi, > > according to > > and other resources, SUN develops a new codec called OMS, which "is a > royalty-free code

Re: mined copyright with no copyright

Hi All, I'm returning with this issue :) (was busy with studies) Well, the last time i contacted Thomas Wolff about this and he replied with this: --- Hi Mauro, I confirm there was no copyright notice or file attached, just a doc file with the line Author: Michiel Huisjes. near the top. There is

Re: [OctDev] Clarification about PDF file license

* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-18 10:35]: > That being the case a GPL compatible documentation license would be a > better solution. Can you please suggest an appropriate modification of > the documentation license to make it GPL compatible. I see no issues > making this change as al

Re: [OctDev] Clarification about PDF file license

Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:00:06 +0200 David Bateman wrote: > > >> Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> > [...] > >>> * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-10 11:15]: >>> >>> >>> Just a further question, if the documentation is distributed as part of >>

Re: [OctDev] Clarification about PDF file license

Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:27:56 +0200 Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > [...] > >> * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-10 11:15]: >> > [...] > >> I am not a license expert and I have no idea whether including GPL code in a >> non-GPL released documentation is ok

bring back H.261 encoding

Package: ffmpeg Severity: wishlist Version: 0.svn20080206-1 Hi, according to and other resources, SUN develops a new codec called OMS, which "is a royalty-free codec loosely based on the h.26x codec family". In the FAQ the