Le dimanche 31 août 2008 à 04:17 +0300, Sami Liedes a écrit :
I went through some of these and checked them by hand, and generally
couldn't find the glade project anywhere in the source tarball (it
might be in the diff, I didn't check for that - would that BTW be OK,
to have source code in
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 04:17 +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
I grepped the source tarballs in Lenny (testing) main section for the
note DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade. which
indicates the file is generated using the Glade UI editor. Then I
checked if these packages have any *.glade*
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 23:19 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Sami Liedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only questionable case I found
by this sampling is dia, where the file is generated by Glade and
then hand-coded to make GNOME optional and add the
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
davi.leals wrote:
Just host the source code at Savannah or any other similar service.
How does that scale when a lot of users modify or customize the code?
Arc Riley wrote:
These are technical challenges, not legal problems, and will be solved by
the community as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miriam Ruiz wrote: [...]
And, how can one do that and at the same time keep being anonymous
(dissident test)?
If you do not modify the code or you do not have remote users, you do not
have
to offer your copy of the Source Code.
= you cannot modify the webapp =
Francesco Poli wrote:
I think you chose the wrong example: the written offer possibility
(clause 3b in GPLv2, clause 6b in GPLv3) is a non-free path through the
GPL.
In other words, if making the written offer were the *only* way to
distribute GPL'd object code, the GPL would *not* meet the
* Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080828 10:53]:
Since anyone can get a free, anonymous account at any number of free VCS
solutions, and since a dissident only need share source with those they're
already permitting remote access over a network to, I do not see any
situation where this would
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 04:17 +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
I grepped the source tarballs in Lenny (testing) main section for the
note DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade. which
indicates the file is generated using the Glade UI editor. Then I
checked if these
Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This thread has slipped into absurdity.
That largely seems to be the result of talking past each other.
These fringe cases with the viewpoint that free software copyright
holders are just biting at the bit to take people to court
retroactively for
9 matches
Mail list logo
