Re: public domain, take ∞
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For works that are not a "script", or that have copyright holders > who are not an "author", would this be a further improvement: > >The copyright holder of this work hereby grants irrevocable >permission to any party who may have access to it to threat it as >though it were a work to which any and all copyrights have >expired. The Creative Common's CC0 project will probably be a better alternative once it is finalised: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: public domain, take ∞
Please excuse the thread necromancy. Hopefully it's better to demonstrate that I've searched the archives than not :-) Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [regarding an attempt to formulate a generally-applicable copyright > declaration achieving the effect of public domain] > > "The author of this script hereby grants irrevocable permission to > any party who may have access to it to treat it as though it were a > work to which any and all copyrights have expired." > > I think that would be an improvement. For works that are not a “script”, or that have copyright holders who are not an “author”, would this be a further improvement: The copyright holder of this work hereby grants irrevocable permission to any party who may have access to it to threat it as though it were a work to which any and all copyrights have expired. -- \“My house is made out of balsa wood, so when I want to scare | `\ the neighborhood kids I lift it over my head and tell them to | _o__) get out of my yard or I'll throw it at them.” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TrueCrypt License 2.5
Philipp Hübner schrieb: > The click-wrap mechanism wouldn't be a problem, sun-java does the same. > If this is the only difficulty I'd give it a try. sun-java is in non-free. Click-wrap licensee mechanisms makes the license non-free if you are not allowed to remove this mechanism from the source code - if you are allowed to remove it from the source, then do it and it is fine. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
