Hi,
Does anyone know how this affects us -if it does- and if it might
change anything for the packages and programs that have problems with
software patents? Might there be any consequences out of this -even
though it is somehow USA-specific- or is it just blog noise?
Greetings,
Miry
The
The message entitled :-
Re: F.C. Doc.
sent to :-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on :-
2008-11-25 at 15:28:35
has been quarantined at the Land Securities email gateway. This is because an
executable attachment has been detected within the email.
If the quarantined email is work related simply
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Cristian Greco schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm working for a new upload of deluge[0] (bittorrent client).
The source tarball includes a GeoLite Country (binary) database by
MaxMind, which should be distributed using the
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:09:27 + MJ Ray wrote:
Raphael Geissert wrote:
-legal: can a final concensus be reached on whether this licence is
DFSG-free?
I'm happy to support
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00128.html
To summarise:-
- unacceptable name approval
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Yeah it was considered non-free. I adopted the package and fixed the
issues together with the upstream authors. It is fixed since I am
repackaging it with a dfsg tarball.
I see your point here.
I had a look at your geoip
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
I repeatedly stated my opinion on the PHP license and its unfixed
issues: I personally think that the PHP License (up to version 3.01),
fails to meet the DFSG, even for PHP itself!
However I failed to gain consensus on debian-legal about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cristian Greco schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Yeah it was considered non-free. I adopted the package and fixed the
issues together with the upstream authors. It is fixed since I am
repackaging it with a
7 matches
Mail list logo
