"Stéphane Glondu" wrote:
So one could even
make a proprietary compiler using C as an intermediate langage, and GCC
for the final stage, I guess.
Comeau C++'s GNU/Linux builds do exactly that. (In general it uses the local
C compiler as a slightly higher level assembler. This saves them the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:41:08AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Maybe taking derived code (e.g. including new code), one could write only
> the license of aggregate work (thus one "later" license),
I think so. I agree it could be better to list them explicitly, but
upstream doesn't want that
2009/4/14 Michael Crawford :
> There are actually four licenses to consider. Each is different from
> the others in significant ways; it would be a terrible mistake to
> choose any of them without fully understanding the consequences of
> one's choice:
>
> GPL2 only
> GPL2 or any later version
> G
3 matches
Mail list logo
