On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:43:53PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It seems like AMD should really be distributing these header files
> > with a maximum permissive license like MIT/Expat or similar.
> > Perhaps someone should contact them and try to get it
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:43:53PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> > Francesco Poli wrote:
>> > > Where is this proprietary library distributed?
>> >
>> > In AMD website.
>> >
>> > If the user downloads it and installs it, BOINC
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:43:53PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> > Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > Where is this proprietary library distributed?
> >
> > In AMD website.
> >
> > If the user downloads it and installs it, BOINC will use it, and will be
> >
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that there is consensus on choice-of-venue being
> > acceptable. I suspect there's a mix of considering it acceptable,
> > thinking we can fight it when needed and ignorance.
>
> This choice-of-venue discussion looks like it won't get
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> mdpo...@troilus.org wrote:
> >The usual argument is that choice of venue violates DFSG #5 by
> >discriminating against people who live outside the venue. Is there some
I feel it's some combination of DFSG 5 (discriminating on location)
and DFSG 1 (non-monetary cost of use),
5 matches
Mail list logo
