Licence for new package algol68toc

2012-01-04 Thread Sian Mountbatten
Please find attached the copyright for this new package. Should the package go into contrib or can it go into main? Regards -- Dr Sian Mountbatten User of siduction This is Algol68toC, maintained by Sian Mountbatten poenik...@fastmail.co.uk on Wed 4 Jan 2012 13:00:00 + The original source of

Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released

2012-01-04 Thread MJ Ray
Paul Wise p...@debian.org Mozilla has released the Mozilla Public License version 2.0: http://lwn.net/Articles/474070/ http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2012/01/03/mozilla-public-license-version-2-0-released/ https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/ Is the headline that, in a fit of Not Invented Hear

Re: Licence for new package algol68toc

2012-01-04 Thread Ben Finney
Sian Mountbatten poenik...@fastmail.co.uk writes: Please find attached the copyright for this new package. Where is the new package? There are multiple licenses, and it's not clear what they're referring to. The freedom of a work is best determined by examining the work and the license

Re: Licence for new package algol68toc

2012-01-04 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Sian Mountbatten poenik...@fastmail.co.uk writes: Please find attached the copyright for this new package. Where is the new package? There are multiple licenses, and it's not clear what they're referring to. The freedom of a work is best

Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released

2012-01-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:53 AM, MJ Ray wrote: Is the headline that, in a fit of Not Invented Hear and licence proliferation, Mozilla is planning to phase out the GPL/LGPL tri-licensing? Please redirect your complaints somewhere they may have an affect, to Mozilla themselves or one of the