legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms

2012-01-12 Thread Harald Jenny
Hello all, I'm currently doing some private packaging of http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagios-sap-ccms/files/ and was wondering if it would be possbile to ship this package in Debian non-free - there are some binary only libraries in the source package but this does not seems to stop OpenSuSE

Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms

2012-01-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Harald Jenny wrote: I'm currently doing some private packaging of http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagios-sap-ccms/files/ and was wondering if it would be possbile to ship this package in Debian non-free - there I don't think that is possible since there is no

Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released

2012-01-12 Thread Gervase Markham
On 05/01/12 23:16, Francesco Poli wrote: Clause 1.5(b) fails to solve existing compatibility headaches. It disables the default (L)GPL compatibility (caused by clause 3.3) for those works that were previously incompatible because they were only licensed under the MPL v1.1 (or earlier). This

Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms

2012-01-12 Thread Ciaran Farrell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/12 13:52, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Harald Jenny wrote: I'm currently doing some private packaging of http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagios-sap-ccms/files/ and was wondering if it would be possbile to ship this

Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms

2012-01-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ciaran Farrell wrote: The latter is correct, though the spec file and the license documentation in the package should be more clear about that. I've asked one of our packagers to handle this. Does that mean Debian also has permission to distribute? -- bye,

Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms

2012-01-12 Thread Ben Finney
Ciaran Farrell cfarr...@suse.de writes: On 12/01/12 13:52, Paul Wise wrote: Either [OpenSUSE] don't care about the legal issues or they have a special license to distribute. The latter is correct, […] Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: Does that mean Debian also has permission to