Figlet relicensed from AFL to BSD-3

2012-05-14 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
[Originally sent yesterday, but silently dropped due to over-size. Resending modified version now.] Hi -legal, I am currently working on an updated figlet package (which currently in non-free see #274950 and [1]). During my work I discovered that the 2.2.3 release [2] re-licensed the package as

Re: Figlet relicensed from AFL to BSD-3

2012-05-14 Thread MJ Ray
Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com To me, this means that the main figlet package is now DFSG-compliant. Would someone else be able to confirm for me that this package is ok to move back from non-free to main? If all the files are now under that licence, I think it is OK. (crc.c, crc.h,

Re: Figlet relicensed from AFL to BSD-3

2012-05-14 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
On 14 May 2012 10:10, MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote: Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com If all the files are now under that licence, I think it is OK. (crc.c, crc.h, inflate.c, inflate.h, zipio.c, zipio.h had a licence that compelled distribution, not AFL. I have not checked that they