[Originally sent yesterday, but silently dropped due to over-size.
Resending modified version now.]
Hi -legal,
I am currently working on an updated figlet package (which currently in
non-free see #274950 and [1]).
During my work I discovered that the 2.2.3 release [2] re-licensed the
package as
Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com
To me, this means that the main figlet package is now DFSG-compliant.
Would someone else be able to confirm for me that this package is ok to
move back from non-free to main?
If all the files are now under that licence, I think it is OK.
(crc.c, crc.h,
On 14 May 2012 10:10, MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com
If all the files are now under that licence, I think it is OK.
(crc.c, crc.h, inflate.c, inflate.h, zipio.c, zipio.h had a licence
that compelled distribution, not AFL. I have not checked that they
3 matches
Mail list logo