Re: Request for comment on license file

(Simon, please remember to respond interleaved as normal for email.) Simon Kainz writes: > Currently torque 2.4.16 is in main, so i take it for granted that it's > license is DFSG compatible, otherwise it wouldn't be there(at least it > would't for such a long time). Best not to assume that :-)

Re: Request for comment on license file

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:49:07 +0100 Simon Kainz wrote: [...] > Hello again. Hi! > > I'm still pondering about this issue and now have a different approach: > > Currently torque 2.4.16 is in main, so i take it for granted that it's > license is DFSG compatible, otherwise it wouldn't be there(at