On 2015-09-30 04:38, Jeff Epler wrote:
> I was unaware of this detail of the GPLv3 license.
>
> The first source file that I looked at in linuxsampler's svn trunk,
> src/linuxsampler.cpp, has the "any later version" clause enabled.
a quick check shows that of the 303 sourcefiles ("*.cpp" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-30 02:18, Ben Finney wrote:
> Yes, that is clearly what the GPL calls an “additional restriction”
> on the recipient's exercise of their freedoms guaranteed by the
> GPL.
>
> GPLv2 §6:
>
> Each time you redistribute the Program (or any
hi,
i've just packaged and submitted the r-cran-afex package, and it has
been accepted
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797819
but now i'm wondering if it doesn't violate the GPL2.
it is released under GPL3+, but it has dependencies which are GPL2
r-cran-afex and its
Jonathon Love writes ("r-cran-afex package, violates the GPL?"):
> i've just packaged and submitted the r-cran-afex package, and it has
> been accepted
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797819
>
> but now i'm wondering if it doesn't violate the GPL2.
>
> it is released under
hi ian,
On 30/09/2015 2:58 pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jonathon Love writes ("r-cran-afex package, violates the GPL?"):
>> i've just packaged and submitted the r-cran-afex package, and it has
>> been accepted
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797819
>>
>> but now i'm wondering
5 matches
Mail list logo
