"Nice To Meet You"
La nouvelle soirée célibataire
Info & Réservation : 06 65 039 239
Vendredi 22 Janvier Soirée Célib' au Mas
Tu es drôle, charmant(e), intelligent(e), cool et... célibataire !
Alors viens découvrir l’expérience « Nice To Meet You » Au Mas !
Ce vendredi 22 Janvier sera donc
Dear Fellows of the Debian Legal List,
Currently most of the software available via my homepage
www.elstel.org is under S-FSL, a license which guarantees free usage and
certain modification rights but which is not a true open source license.
Debian packages would have been available for
Dear Riley Baird,
Am 2016-01-21 um 22:44 schrieb Riley Baird:
Hi,
In order to improve the situation and make this software available to
a broader public I have once more designed a completely new license from
scratch: the so called 'Convertible Free Software License'.
It's almost never
Hi Jonathon,
Am 2016-01-21 um 22:33 schrieb jonathon:
>
>
> On 21/01/2016 21:49, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>
>> a broader public I have once more designed a completely new license
from scratch:
>
> What problem are you trying with this license, that other licenses don't
> solve?
>
I have
Hi,
>In order to improve the situation and make this software available to
> a broader public I have once more designed a completely new license from
> scratch: the so called 'Convertible Free Software License'.
It's almost never a good idea to make your own license. And I know how
you
On 21/01/2016 21:49, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> a broader public I have once more designed a completely new license from
> scratch:
What problem are you trying with this license, that other licenses don't
solve?
> 3. It is your obligation that the changed version of your sources will
> be
On 21/01/16 22:33, jonathon wrote:
5. When applying changes to the source code you need to leave your name,
your email address and the date of your modifications so that other
people may contact you.
Fails the Desert Island Test
jonathon
Maybe not.
a) The guy could have an email address
> Also, I do not like the idea of someone being able
> to change the licence of my derived work without my permission.
Actually, I changed my mind about this. I do think it is fine to allow
people to re-licence my derived work, I just do not think that it
should only be the original authors that
Elmar Stellnberger writes:
> I have various issues about current licenses. Just see at what makes
> this license pretty much different from other established licenses.
> Let us discuss this in detail when the license should be fit for
> approval.
Please do not compound the
Some general feedback:
On 21/01/16 22:49, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
CONVERTIBLE FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE
Version 0.8, 2016-01-21 , *** This is just a draft ***
copyright 2016, by Elmar Stellnberger
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document. You must
> 3. It is your obligation that the changed version of your sources will
> be available to the public for free. Available for free means that there
> will be no undue hinderance in obtaining the given item like a
> registration of the person who wants to download or obtain the given
> item.
11 matches
Mail list logo