Frederic Bonnard writes:
> I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging
> process of a library called libvecpf.
Thanks for raising this while doing the packaging work, it is important
to get this right.
> It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are 2 additional files which are
> agre
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:26:48 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Francesco Poli writes ("Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license"):
[...]
> > Well, in my own personal opinion, CC-by-v3.0 requirements on
> > attribution are not so easy and practical to comply with [1].
> > This is one of the reasons wh
Frederic Bonnard writes ("[Individual|Corporate] Contributor License
Agreement"):
> I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging
> process of a library called libvecpf. It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are
> 2 additional files which are agreements.
> Depending if you are an indiv
Hi Frederic,
these agreements seem to cover how one may contribute the code back
upstream. I think that upstream is free to put any rules here -- there
are upstreams that completely reject outside contributions, and other
require a transfer of the copyright. Everyting is fine here.
So, I would no
Hi everybody,
I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging
process of a library called libvecpf. It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are
2 additional files which are agreements.
Depending if you are an individual contributor or a corporate one :
- https://github.com/Libvecpf/libvecpf
5 matches
Mail list logo