Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement

2016-09-07 Thread Ben Finney
Frederic Bonnard writes: > I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging > process of a library called libvecpf. Thanks for raising this while doing the packaging work, it is important to get this right. > It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are 2 additional files which are > agre

Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license

2016-09-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:26:48 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote: > Francesco Poli writes ("Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license"): [...] > > Well, in my own personal opinion, CC-by-v3.0 requirements on > > attribution are not so easy and practical to comply with [1]. > > This is one of the reasons wh

Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement

2016-09-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Frederic Bonnard writes ("[Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement"): > I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging > process of a library called libvecpf. It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are > 2 additional files which are agreements. > Depending if you are an indiv

Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement

2016-09-07 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Frederic, these agreements seem to cover how one may contribute the code back upstream. I think that upstream is free to put any rules here -- there are upstreams that completely reject outside contributions, and other require a transfer of the copyright. Everyting is fine here. So, I would no

[Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement

2016-09-07 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi everybody, I'm wondering if an agreement meets the DFSG during the packaging process of a library called libvecpf. It's under GPLv2.1+ but there are 2 additional files which are agreements. Depending if you are an individual contributor or a corporate one : - https://github.com/Libvecpf/libvecpf