Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

2017-12-12 Thread John Lindgren
Hi Nicholas et. al, (tallica: This is re: Debian bug #883731, related to the GPL -> BSD relicensing of Audacious a few years back. Please take a look at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883731 for background if you're interested, otherwise disregard.) On 12/12/2017 04:39 PM,

Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

2017-12-12 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:39:28 -0500 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [...] > This is one of the reasons the FSF demands copyright > assignment for their projects...they want to be able to relicense at > any point in the future without having to contact and document consent > from all contributors. Yeah,

Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

2017-12-12 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Ian, Francesco, John, and everyone else reading this, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:28:43AM -0500, John Lindgren wrote: > On 12/10/2017 06:12 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > In particular I'm concerned about lines like this from > > d/copyright: > > > > "po/uk.po" is © 2005 Mykola Lynnyk and

Re: Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR

2017-12-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Ikeda Yuichi wrote: > I like excellent package system of Debian operating system. > I have been using for a long time. Thank you. You might like to have your company listed as a commercial user of Debian on our website. https://www.debian.org/users/ >

Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR

2017-12-12 Thread Ikeda . Yuichi
Dear Sir/Madam, I like excellent package system of Debian operating system. I have been using for a long time. Thank you. I'm sorry I made a duplicate question. I know that it is not a good manners, however, we have to found clear description about ECCN for a product, or have to make an