Ian Jackson writes:
> There are existing packages for which I consider the PFM to include
> the git history. I'm not pressing this point from a legal point of
> view because, well, that just generates lots of heat and no light.
> I think that we should address this potential problem by
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL"):
> Are you asking this hypothetically, or is there a piece of software that
> someone intends to apply this to?
There are existing packages for which I consider the PFM to include
the git history. I'm not pressing this point from a legal
2 matches
Mail list logo
