that?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
and not the whole work.
As 3-clause-BSD is GPL-compatible, you can redistribute the whole work
under the conditions of the GPL. However, there are identifiable
sections that can distributed under an even more permissive license.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5
://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
status, it's more difficult than before.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
paying nothing; it just makes it less
likely that you would win if he sues you.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040711 14:40]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A typical warranty disclaimer doesn't prohibit you from suing the
author; it just makes it less likely that you would win if you did.
That's a bogus reason. A typical you must give the author 1000
-free
is no longer an helpful guide for our users and also not for ourself.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
that without a GR in a new thread on
-project.
Perhaps the documentation archive is just not considered to be part of
Debian (the Distribution).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
, they already browse debian-legal.
Some people who care have just given up to discuss here.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
to respect choice of venue clauses in
copyright-based licenses?
What do you mean by personal jurisdiction? E.g. for a lawsuite in
the USA it is sufficient if the person who claims to be damaged lives
there.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C
team, and removing should also not be
done without coordination (except that of course the maintainer can
always declare any issues as release critical for his package, means:
also remove the sarge-ignore tag).
Thanks,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050722 23:47]:
* Matthew Garrett:
There's two main issues here.
1) Does everything in main have to include the preferred form of
modification?
I don't believe so,
We had a GR that is usually interpreted in a manner which disagrees
with you.
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050722 23:56]:
* Andreas Barth:
Actually, the DFSG says:
| 2. Source Code
|
| The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in
| source code as well as compiled form.
Obviously e.g. fonts are no programms, even
* Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050723 11:15]:
(CC's trimmed.)
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 09:21:04AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
It's clear from the context (and previous discussion) that this has to
be interpreted as software.
I disagree with that. As there were editorial changes
* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050727 18:45]:
On 7/27/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, I don't? I said that the other guidelines are *applicable* to
non-program works, and *should be applied* to non-program works -- not that,
as presently written, we are obliged to apply
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050728 16:19]:
* Steve McIntyre:
The interpretation I outlined is certainly not new. It reflects the
current practice, and I think we're in a pretty good position as far
as compliance is concerned. Even the notorious GNU FDL issue is not a
real problem
of such publications is for non-commercial use
| only and no modifications of the publication is made.
If not, we should consider how to get to the goal with minimum effort on
all sides.
Thanks for your support.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
it be a good idea to make just sync the dev ref with what
you consider as best practice? (And, BTW, I make much effort to only
update the dev ref with correct information.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060525 08:15]:
On 24 May 2006, Andreas Barth stated:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060524 17:54]:
So I guess you can still criticize folks for this if you want to,
but I know that my own ongoing notion of best practices comes
from stuff I
://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
together
official Debian statements. This is ok, and good, but of course, that's
the exception and not the rule.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/lm_04_06_dvd.html
I think the best way to handle this is if local DDs check the issue and
speak with them - as I'm local, I'll put it on my todo-list.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
also say what worked well.
The DVD worked well. Handing out DVDs to Debian also. The headline also.
Just not the print on the DVDs itself, which was not meant bad and can
be fixed in future. And now, please let's get back to work on etch.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
to me. Who are you, and how do
you judge what is proper use of Debian's trademarks and what not?
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Actually, I think you told us how you would deal with it, and your
latest mails didn't had any further input, so I suggest that you leave
it to us what we actually do. Repeating the same content over and over
doesn't really help.
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
there is one thing I definitly don't want to
see: That this magazine creates another DVD based on sarge for next
year's CeBiT - independend of how they title the DVD. They should base
it on etch.
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Markus Laire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 15:01]:
I have somewhat similar feelings after I found out that the
cdrtools-package[1] included in Debian isn't DFSG-free, but is still
included in main.
(Even worse, its license might even be illegal because it's GPLv2 +
incombatible
://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to me, and
I currently don't see the issue with GPL there.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such hints for the
firefox users, they should ask us (though that would make upgrades for
our users more difficult). Otherwise, this discussion is just a waste of
time.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
* Sean Kellogg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061207 00:26]:
Debian just doesn't want to be bothered with the hassel of
having to build the brand of Iceweasel, so it appears to have decided to
co-opt the Firefox name.
That is a lie.
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
