On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:58:15PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:01:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
A split of the tvtime upstream distribution is necessary no matter what;
but as I understand it, the bit that would go into contrib could be
omitted entirely
a question mark about transparency (might not
be relevant) and a problem with use of invariant sections in some
(all?) FSF manuals (is relevant) which has no sign of being addressed.
The COPYING IN QUANTITY business still rubs me the wrong way.
--
G. Branden Robinson| We either
. I can't promise I'll remember on every message.
The header is called Mail-Followup-To:.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Reality is what refuses to go away
Debian GNU/Linux | when I stop believing in it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Philip K. Dick
don't you post the license text in a new thread and we can sink our
teeth into it?
Now that I've relieved myself of my LPPL analysis obligation, I'm ready
for a new challenge. It may help distract me from the GNU FDL
discussion, which I think Bruce would like to see. :-P
--
G. Branden Robinson
] http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
--
G. Branden Robinson| What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU/Linux | reading the Bible cover to cover.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Twice.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- J. Michael
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:24:00PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I think that Richard addressed already several of the recurrent
questions from debian-legal. Can we move forward
the DFSG tells us nothing else about them.
I must confess to some disappointment in the cogency of your reasoning.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Intellectual property is neither
Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual nor property.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:40:08AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a postscript, could you please summarize, to the debian-private list,
the efforts you've made to date to bring the parties to the table, apart
from those we've already seen
-neutral
in this respect.
You can submit a proposal for reverting the change, if you're serious.
But the proper list for discussion of this point is debian-policy. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson|It is the responsibility of
Debian GNU/Linux |intellectuals to tell
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:16:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
This license is obviously (to me) DFSG-free:
* There are no use or copying (as such) restrictions at all.
* Permission to modify is unfettered except for preservation of license
terms.
* Permission to redistribute
else under the
GNU GPL.
Thanks for reiterating the point though. It is worth repeating. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Bother, said Pooh, as he was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | assimilated by the Borg.
http://people.debian.org
[ Mailing list admins, please see the end of this message. ]
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:11:16AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:16:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* GAWK: The GNU Awk User's Guide; Edition 2, for the 3.0.3 (or later)
version of the GNU
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:08:34AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:06:01AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Yes, though it should be kept in mind that the GPL-incompatibility
problem remains. We *still* won't be able to drop hunks of these
manuals
feature set than I do, though, so I'll let him
speak to that.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The software said it required
Debian GNU/Linux | Windows 3.1 or better, so I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | installed Linux.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
, with nothing but hearsay evidence of
anything to the contrary.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Communism is just one step on the
Debian GNU/Linux | long road from capitalism to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | capitalism.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Men are born ignorant, not stupid.
Debian GNU/Linux | They are made stupid by education.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Bertrand Russell
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpobEgDNyKWL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:56:03PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
For the Release Manager: What standard do you set for the repudiation of
the aforementioned hearsay?
Why is he setting it at all?
I don't think that giving
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:56:46PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
Branden Robinson presumes that the GNU Project's decision to stop
endorsing Debian must be meant as a form of pressure.
Again, I fear you have distorted my statements. I made no preumption on
this point; I made a hypothesis
is going to be open-ended.)
--
G. Branden Robinson| The only way to get rid of a
Debian GNU/Linux | temptation is to yield to it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Oscar Wilde
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpOMUboCiS23.pgp
://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg01022.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg01210.html
[3]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200308/msg00089.html
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux
to make reasonable conjectures
as to which files comprise the Work.
END OF ANALYSIS
Whew! I apologize again for the stupidly long delay. Thank you again
for your boundless patience.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Human beings rarely imagine a god
Debian GNU/Linux
the utility of the documentation.
Well, in that case there's tons of non-DFSG-free stuff that we can start
moving into main.
If utility is sufficient to excuse non-DFSG-freeness, then we don't
really need the DFSG at all.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
it, the bit that would go into contrib could be
omitted entirely. I presume the maintainer wants to go ahead and
provide the contrib components as a service to our users.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't
, so he shall be far more credible than random subscriber of
debian-legal. So, it may as well be seen as the test case for the
DFSG as for the GFDL.
When I looked up Appeal to Authority in my _Basic Logical Fallacies_
textbook, I saw the above.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Don't use
, or simply invalid.
--
G. Branden Robinson| You are not angry with people when
Debian GNU/Linux | you laugh at them. Humor teaches
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | them tolerance.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- W. Somerset Maugham
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:17:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
You ground your argument on second hand reports of clarifications in
the first quoted paragraph, but then expect debian-legal to furnish
first-hand clarifications
it yet.
/me hangs his head shamefacedly so he doesn't have to look Frank
Mittelbach in the face
--
G. Branden Robinson|Ambition: an overmastering desire
Debian GNU/Linux |to be vilified by enemies while
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |living
of
this nature is palatable to two organizations that each claim so
stridently to be founded on principle.
I am, however, hopeful for the future. Thanks for your efforts.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It's not a matter of alienating
Debian GNU/Linux | authors
empowered being willing to exercise that power.
I'm not even sure that that would be an appropriate course of action at
this point, as thanks to Manoj Srivastava we really do appear to be
making concrete procedural progress again.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you make people think
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:34:03AM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
I am _not_ calling for horse-trading between the two organizations.
Oops, that will teach me not to read the whole thread before replying...
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux
to your costs, and rest easy
without any three-year obligations.
--
G. Branden Robinson|People are equally horrified at
Debian GNU/Linux |hearing the Christian religion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |doubted, and at seeing it
http://people.debian.org
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:56:58PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
Branden Robinson wrote:
I have seven questions for you based on this episode:
Branden is trying to make innocent things look bad; shame on him.
This is an assertion without foundation. If you feel there are implicit
professionalism among judges.
(Not every state does this, and this does not occur in the federal
courts.)
--
G. Branden Robinson|A committee is a life form with six
Debian GNU/Linux |or more legs and no brain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:41:37PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* To my knowledge, in the U.S, a statement from all the copyright
holders of a work is sufficient to place it in the public domain, if
they want to do so before it would otherwise
software. I would even see it as valid that it
violates Section 9 of the DFSG (License Must Not Contaminate Other
Software).
When referring to a license, it's useful to provide a URL to the text of
the license in question.
--
G. Branden Robinson|As people do better
*except* challenge the
freeness of GNU FDL to lose your endorsement?
--
G. Branden Robinson| There is no gravity in space.
Debian GNU/Linux | Then how could astronauts walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | around on the Moon?
http
a couple of months ago why they are smaller.)
None of us have ever considered saying that the 4-clause BSD license
is non-free, or suggesting that programs under such licenses should
be removed from Debian main.
I've considered it.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Somebody once
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 07:29:42PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
I don't think the MPL was ever properly reviewed here :(
I don't think it was, but IMO it is not a DFSG-compatible license.
--
G. Branden Robinson|The basic test of freedom is
Debian GNU/Linux
think; change some whitespace.)
I asked for clarification on this point months ago.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200305/msg00091.html
From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: the GPL FAQ
. Branden Robinson|I have a truly elegant proof of the
Debian GNU/Linux |above, but it is too long to fit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |into this .signature file.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpc0vZ0cigA9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. Branden Robinson| I suspect Linus wrote that in a
Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | have that comment in there.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius
pgpCvnh8blham.pgp
in the case of
corporations[1]).
[1] This parenthetical is a facetious exaggeration. I think.
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got
not until we have some sort of equivalent of a public legislative record
of our past decisions. Given the way we operate, most of the time I
doubt we'll have such a thing.
--
G. Branden Robinson|As people do better, they start
Debian GNU/Linux |voting
is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license
by those parties.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Men use thought only to justify
Debian GNU/Linux |their wrong doings, and speech only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |to conceal their thoughts
copyright doesn't even
appear in the DFSG.
Anything which is used to abridge the freedoms that attach to Free
Software violates the DFSG.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | // // // / /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | EI
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:51:55PM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
Branden Robinson wrote:
# Distribution of License
The rights attached to the program must apply to all to whom the program
is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license
by those parties
. Branden Robinson| The Rehnquist Court has never
Debian GNU/Linux | encountered a criminal statute it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | did not like.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Dean
pgpTywlFlzAKZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are.
--
G. Branden Robinson|The best place to hide something is
Debian GNU/Linux |in documentation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Ethan Benson
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpoUJq9Rku7X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, called it _Babylon
5_, and didn't get sued.
/flamebait
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
. Lenin?
(If you don't get this, move on...)
--
G. Branden Robinson|Build a fire for a man, and he'll
Debian GNU/Linux |be warm for a day. Set a man on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |fire, and he'll be warm for the
http://people.debian.org
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 07:17:46PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Thursday, Aug 21, 2003, at 01:09 US/Eastern, Branden Robinson wrote:
[why to the mailing list...?]
So people can verify the results for themselves, and will be less likely
to accuse me of falsifying the results.
Or so I
-legal-200308/msg01214.html
[3] http://www.debian.org/social_contract
--
G. Branden Robinson|Ambition: an overmastering desire
Debian GNU/Linux |to be vilified by enemies while
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |living and ridiculed by friends
http
wouldn't ship these files at all.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200112/msg00250.html
--
G. Branden Robinson|There is no housing shortage in
Debian GNU/Linux |Lincoln today -- just a rumor that
[EMAIL PROTECTED
for a performance of any kind, of itself,
to be encapsulated in a data package.
As far as recordings/transcriptions/etc. of performances go, I don't see
why they wouldn't be covered fairly straightforwardly under these
criteria.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Of two competing
that documentation should be judged by a
different standard than the DFSG.
What's your threshold of statistical significance? I'd like to know for
the purposes of commentary on my final survey reponse summary, which I
can produce about 12 hours from now if I'm still awake.
--
G. Branden Robinson
not the
case here.
Please file a bug against www.debian.org, and feel free to quote this
message.
--
G. Branden Robinson|As people do better, they start
Debian GNU/Linux |voting like Republicans -- unless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |they have
' GPG
signatures) since I'm tallying by hand. The margins look large so I
don't expect a minor tabulation error to affect the outcome, but it's
still good to be accurate.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Organized religion is a sham and a
Debian GNU/Linux | crutch
to software, not patented technology,
and since the Debian Free Software Guidelines therefore do not apply,
patented technology is perfectly acceptable for inclusion in the
Debian GNU/Linux Distribution.
However, that's not *my* opinion. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| When I die I want
a bunch of code to it, maybe something really handy like the ability to
run Win32 apps natively.
Won't happen with Linux -- please review the license applied to the
Linux kernel. It's missing a certain phrase.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
Debian
^^
Um, where in the world can *ideas* be copyrightable?
Indeed. I'm glad to see the disposition of #181493 is in such assertive
hands.
--
G. Branden Robinson|It is the responsibility of
Debian GNU/Linux |intellectuals to tell
freedom lives!
I would only suggest s/text/content/, so that non-texual material
(illustrations and so forth) are also unambiguously covered.
[analysis snipped]
Bravo.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I am sorry, but what you have
Debian GNU/Linux |mistaken
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:41:26PM +0200, Sergey Spiridonov wrote:
According to your statement, any license do not put any restriction on
user. It does a copyright law. GPL lifts some limits to restrict users.
So does FDL.
Not enough to make it Free.
--
G. Branden Robinson
requirment of the inclusion of Invariant Sections is not
waived when the material quoted from the manual, or the manual itself,
is not large.
--
G. Branden Robinson| One doesn't have a sense of humor.
Debian GNU/Linux | It has you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
with the coherence of a
Markov-chain-based conversation simulator.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Religion is regarded by the common
Debian GNU/Linux |people as true, by the wise as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |false, and by the rulers as useful.
http
.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Intellectual property is neither
Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual nor property.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Discuss.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Linda Richman
pgpZPr49Cs1UD.pgp
Description: PGP
. :)
Maybe it was Utah...
--
G. Branden Robinson| Communism is just one step on the
Debian GNU/Linux | long road from capitalism to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | capitalism.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Russian saying
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:40:27PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-08-27 21:14:42 +0100 Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would only suggest s/text/content/, so that non-texual material
(illustrations and so forth) are also unambiguously covered.
content is rather, uh, vague. How
.
Such things are very hard to estimate. What is clear is that one does
not use a viewer program to read a manual published on paper.
If one is blind, and does not have access to a Braille version of the
manual in question, one might do that very thing.
--
G. Branden Robinson| There's
. The OPL (Open Publication License), predates
the GNU FDL.
The GNU FDL was written in part as a reaction to the OPL.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED
when people point out your distortions, isn't it?
Makes it considerably more difficult to cheat fair and sqaure.
--
G. Branden Robinson| There's nothing an agnostic can't
Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:26, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:03, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote
the goal, and that _some_ cure is worse than the desease?
There's no point in asking that question. People seldom come to doubt their
own means retrospectively.
--
G. Branden Robinson| That's the saving grace of humor:
Debian GNU/Linux | if you fail, no one
:
s/Almost always/Usually/
s/rare //
Perhaps my perception of the frequency of exceptional cases is distorted
by the fact that I subscribe to debian-legal, though. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM
as
vanishingly unlikely.
Personally, I consider the possibility of anyone being able to get away
with a defense of that form exceedinly unlikely.
Ah, the argument from personal incredulity.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:05:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
* Copyright requires the protected subject to be original.
I think that principle is unique to the U.S.; in fact, that's the whole
*point* of this subthread!
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh
the DFSG on its face. The burden of proof is on those
who claim it's been clarified to come up with evidence of such.
This is the converse of the old UWash Pine license issue, where UWash
took a license that was DFSG-free on its face and interpreted it in a
non-free way.
--
G. Branden Robinson
establishes, I cannot say. If that particular
issue[1] remains divisive even afterwards, we may require a General
Resolution to settle it.
[1] not to be confused with should we apply the DFSG to the GNU FDL *at
all*?
--
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:39:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
There have been efforts in the U.S. to undo the effects of _Feist_
through legislation. One example is the Collections of Information
Antipiracy Act[1]. (I don't think that bill passed.)
Lobbyists apparently tried to get
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:39:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I thought basically every place outside the U.S. was like that. Several
times when the U.S. Supreme Court decision of _Feist v. Rural Telephone
Service Co
would succeed or fail?
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | outlaws will @goH7Ok=q4fDj]Kz?.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpQrezGVzuwi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
developers are people who claimed to be Debian Developers but
did not have a well-formed GPG signature on their responses, so I was
unable to verify their claims.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Ambition: an overmastering desire
Debian GNU/Linux |to be vilified
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
We also have essentially the same license with ttf-bitstream-vera.
IMO, that isn't Free Software, either.
--
G. Branden Robinson| One doesn't have a sense of humor.
Debian GNU/Linux | It has
not
distribute this product alone.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Organized religion is a sham and a
Debian GNU/Linux | crutch for weak-minded people who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | need strength in numbers.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
unhelpful and unsupportive of your
thesis.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | laser with remaining eye.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpLU4a1UkQb4.pgp
Description: PGP
. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | If ignorance is bliss,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | is omniscience hell?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgp62z5djjdud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as we don't actually modify the license
terms.
There's no difference between these two things. Not that it has any
relevant to the current discussion.
I think we've argued about this before.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200206/msg00157.html
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:45:14AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
By contrast, modifying the program to look exactly like another one, say
the source code to Windows solitaire, is already prohibited by copyright
Not always.
--
G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise
, he has been known to accuse Debian Developers of violating
clause 4 of the Debian Social Contract (Our Priorities are Our Users
and Free Software) if they don't act on a bug report he has filed fast
enough to suit him.
I would, therefore, not expect him to take your advice.
--
G. Branden
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:55:17AM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
Aside from one secondhand comment on this list,
...which was itself hearsay...
I've seen no indication that the FSF is amenable to any discussion of
possible changes.
--
G. Branden Robinson| To stay young
, and perhaps some clarification added to
ensure that secure transport channels between distributor and
distributee were not a problem, this particular problem might go away.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Build a fire for a man, and he'll
Debian GNU/Linux |be warm
CD-* medium sold.
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R
the text of
the license as written and consider its implications.
It will not always be the FSF enforcing the terms of this license.
--
G. Branden Robinson|There is no housing shortage in
Debian GNU/Linux |Lincoln today -- just a rumor that
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:23:40AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:30:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Please catch up on the archives of this list for the past year or so.
Which is unfortunately not, to me, a very helpful suggestion, as I do not
have the days
Nietzsche
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:32:08PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:54:53 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If make or were stricken, and perhaps some clarification added to
ensure that secure transport channels between distributor and
distributee were
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:12:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I freely admit that this analysis is grounded on U.S.-centric notions of
reverse engineering and originality as a relevant concept to
copyright. In other
lawyers, we don't render legal advice, get your
own lawyer if you want a legal opinion per se, etc.
[2] http://www.debian.org/social_contract
--
G. Branden Robinson| Don't use nuclear weapons to
Debian GNU/Linux | troubleshoot faults.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
on the same medium
must be free software.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I had thought very carefully about
Debian GNU/Linux |committing hara-kiri over this, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |I overslept this morning.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Of two competing theories or
Debian GNU/Linux |explanations, all other things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |being equal, the simpler one is to
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |be preferred. -- Occam's Razor
years.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux |thinking, they'll love you; but if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |hate you
401 - 500 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
