Re: About a license of a package.

2008-02-04 Thread Iain Nicol
files very deliberately changed to say GPLv3 or later from GPLv2 or later. I'd put down the remaining references to v2 as an oversight. * The makehuman website links to SourceForge; I'm not linking to random websites to support my point ;) Regards, -- Iain Nicol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TrueCrypt License 2.3

2008-01-13 Thread Iain Nicol
conditions that the > originators of the algorithm place on its exploitation. I know the reference implementation for Twofish is in the public domain, and it's not been patented. But what happens, hypothetically, if Bruce Schneier were to publicly assert that people should not use the

Re: Final text of AGPL v3

2007-11-20 Thread Iain Nicol
he GNU AGPL needs to > cover all the various protocols and means for network interaction in > order to fully achieve its purpose. > [...] > bringing all kinds of network interaction under the license's scope is > the best way to ensure that the license will function as designed Regards, -- Iain Nicol

Re: Final text of GPL v3

2007-06-29 Thread Iain Nicol
legal notices to interfaces of "the Program" that lack then. I'm curious how far fetched people think this is. If this interpretation were true, then the only burden of this section would be to keep the legal notices in the user interfaces that you keep, but you would *not* be r