Re: OpenSSL, SUN and ECC (patent issue)

Hi, On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:23:25AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: (Did you forget to send to the mailing list? Feel free to quote me in public.) done. On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:59:54PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:16:50PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote

Re: LZW patented file left in .orig.tar source package?

Hello, On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 08:15:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 06:34:14PM +0100, Sander Vesik wrote: Speaking as the upstream - it would also be definately much better if everyone used just the same one tarball and there wasn't a normal source tarball

Re: Berkeley DB curious licensing practice

Hi, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:03:58AM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote: Examples of redistribution include: [...] * Building an application that you install on your company's servers in data centers around the world. I.e. your right to use Berkeley DB for free for in-house

Re: popular swirl...

Hi, On Wed, 31.12.2003 at 09:55:06 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jörgen Hägg said: Somehow the swirl on this page seems familiar... :-) Somehow this thread seems familiar... :-) I miss a statement like We will/won't prosecute this case after reading the archives, but given

Re: Sun Java available from non-free

Hello, On Sat, 20.05.2006 at 16:18:44 -0500, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: three times the usual examination, and was done given the inability to examine the license in public), this sounds _very_ strange to me. I can see why SUN might want their Java in Debian, but your

Re: Sun Java available from non-free

Hello, On Sun, 21.05.2006 at 13:38:57 +0200, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know how much Sun decision-makers are worried that a move against Debian could be bad PR... additionally, it harms *Debian's* PR a great deal if it turns out that Debian needs to pull the package.

Hinner EDV: Correct Logo Usage?

Hello, perchange I came across this web page: http://www.hinner.de/linux/ I was surprised that he uses the Official Logo instead of the Open Logo, and wrote to him about it, stating that my reading of this web page http://www.debian.org/logos/ and his web pages should generally not

Re: Hinner EDV: Correct Logo Usage?

Hi, On Sat, 07.04.2007 at 01:40:02 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What rock have you been hiding under for the past two years while there has been an ongoing, project-wide discussion about how to handle our logos in a manner that allows us to protect trademarks while