[Fwd: license for iozone]

biased as I have been working on Iozone for many years but in my opinion it is a far better tool than Bonnie or Bonnie++. The list of features in Iozone is almost longer than the source code for Bonnie :-) Enjoy, Don Capps [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: bug1 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: license for iozone

Jeff Teunissen wrote: bug1 wrote: I had further corespondence with the author of iozone, trying to get a more defined explinationg of the license restrictions for his program, i got the following response. The following is the only license that Iozone contains: License

What type of license for iozone

iozone (www.iozone.org) is a benchmark program that i would like to have a go at packaging. Im currently steping through the maintainers guide, in section 2.1 it says the program *must* have a license. I emailed one of the authors and told him i would like to package his program for debian, he

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries

Quoting Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is tricky. The relevant section in the GPL is But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries

Quoting Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One of the questions with the GPL is about how tightly you may link GPL code with non-GPL code, for example, when you compile a GPL program and it uses other code in a software library. Have you done anything to define how tightly GPL code