On 02/26/2018 01:54 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please clarify if the license below can be considered
> DFSG-compatible ?
>
> Section 2 doesn't sound very good, but section 3 says that GPL-2+ may be
> applied.
> Will it be fine to simply state that it
On 02/26/2018 06:03 PM, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> could you please clarify if the license below can be considered
>> DFSG-compatible ?
>>
>> Section 2 doesn't sound very good
>
> That’s extremely interesting. Could you elaborate, please?
>
> I did not wdiff(1) it, but it definitely sounds
On 02/26/2018 03:50 PM, Walter Landry wrote:
> Alex Mestiashvili <ames...@rsh2.donotuse.de> writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> could you please clarify if the license below can be considered
>> DFSG-compatible ?
>>
>> Section 2 doesn't sound very good, but
Hi,
could you please clarify if the license below can be considered
DFSG-compatible ?
Section 2 doesn't sound very good, but section 3 says that GPL-2+ may be
applied.
Will it be fine to simply state that it is licensed under GPL-2+ and
also include the original license in d/copyright ?
Thank
4 matches
Mail list logo