Re: backporting licence information for koffice hyphenation

2008-02-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
that in debian/copyright. It is not necessary (though of course preferable) that this information is also available in the orig.tar.gz. (This question comes up quite regulary (i.e. at least once a year) on this list AFAIR, so an archive search might provide further insight) Gruesse, -- Frank

Re: DRAFT: d-d-a mail about removing non-free documentation

2005-09-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Current version can be found at http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:32:01AM +, MJ Ray wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since one of our release goals for etch is to remove any non-DFSG-free documentation from main here

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-06-12 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:33:02AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the work of debian-legal. I support deleting the summaries. I think

removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-23 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
idea how to better present the work of debian-legal. Comments, objections? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian License Summaries

2005-03-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
with a new summary and I didn't care enough to dig out the result of the discussion, I just decided the people on debian-legal would surely contact the web team if they want any changes... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: latex2html goes GPL? [was: Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo]

2005-03-07 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
versions of latex2html under the GNU GPL, version 2., I believe that would be sufficent. IIRC, latex2html has several authors, several of them not reachable easily... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml

2004-06-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
fixed this now. The missing words were license povides. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: IBM Public License (again)

2004-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Perl module (I18N::AcceptLanguage), to write it was probably less time consuming than this discussion. Perhaps I could ask the author why he uses such a complicated license for such a trvial piece of software. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

IBM Public License (again)

2004-05-12 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
/developerworks/oss/license10.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg5.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg00262.html [4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/12/msg00141.html Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:00:50PM -0600, doug jensen wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:49:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Please take a look and comment. The pages are currently not linked nor mentioned on the rest of the website. I will add this after giving you some time

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:29:13PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the pages of the security team), put them online and added a first license, OPL, based on the summary on debian

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html Added them to the index page (perhaps they still need more surrounding text though). Thanks for the suggestion. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:17:29AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-30 03:49]: I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the pages of the security team), put them online and added a first license, OPL, based on the summary

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:12:28AM +0100, Lewis Jardine wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the pages of the security team), put them online and added a first license, OPL, based on the summary on debian

Re: RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:35:04AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:49:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ (and every other mirror of course). Please take a look and comment. The pages are currently not linked nor mentioned

RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org

2004-04-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
some time for feedback and improval suggestions. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ pgp8cYfE0F4Pm.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: CCPL-by

2004-03-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
different backgroudn colors). [not on this list, so please CC me] Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL

2004-03-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
, so they aren't affected by this bug. If my conclusion above are right, I think the SPI board has to handle that bug... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs

2004-03-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
? Have I only to state the fact _that_ I changed the files? TIA, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/