Olleg Samoylov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DFSG primary was developed for software and not adequate to text
documents, which not needed to be builded.
That's wrong, Bruce Perens intended the DFSG to apply to software and
documentation alike when he designed them. See his clarification here:
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But as a practical matter, I don't believe the U.S. Government really
create all that much copyrightable work these days.
I find the CIA World Factbook and much of the data (including images)
released by NASA quite valuable.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) The GPL language talks about software.
Not really. Software is mentioned in the Preamble, in some clarifying
remarks in Section 7, and in Section 10 (referring to software
copyrighted by the FSF). Section 3 talks about media customarily used
for
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- )Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Germany((_/)o o(\_))
\ `-'http://www.zero-based.org/`-'(. .)`-'
`-. \_/
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
License for these is at http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/policy/index.cfm, and
here it is:
---
Unless otherwise noted, images and video on JPL public web sites (public
sites
ending with a jpl.nasa.gov address) may be used for any purpose without
Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In another topic, I prefer the term copyrighted. Copyrightable is
an ugly, ugly term... and everything that is copyrightable is
copyrighted by default...
I see a fine distinction between the two terms. For example, a work
created by the U.S.
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Burnes, James wrote:
3. Is it that you simply want an efficient mechanism for cataloging
efforts of the major contributors to a project? If that's the case why
don't we just come up with some sort of credits standard to be macro
embedded in the
Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:16:50PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Burnes, James wrote:
3. Is it that you simply want an efficient mechanism for cataloging
efforts of the major contributors to a project
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You miss the point. I get plenty of credit because of the filesystem
name. It is everybody else who gets shortchanged unless we print a
randomly chosen 1 paragraph credit at mkreiser4 time.
I'm not a Debian developer. But I don't understand your
9 matches
Mail list logo
