Re: tg3 firmware - was (Fw: [CASE#221365]: Closed - need firmware files)

be expected to have any source code. In this case, as we have a declaration that source code was involved, that doesn't apply here. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpgTGowGy464.pgp Description: PGP

Re: tg3 firmware - was (Fw: [CASE#221365]: Closed - need firmware files)

. Is there *evidence* and *proof* that this is the case? -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/ pgpU3m0cY3frb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Glade no longer generates C source code

from the program that you assert as the generator of the preferred form. gpe-contacts support.c support.h Absolute false positive - the C files have been heavily modified by hand. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http

Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source

. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Does automake pollute the copyright of all packages that use it?

, autoconf, cdbs or dpkg either. It could also be considered as an automake bug that the 'make dist' target requires install-sh to be copied into the .orig.tar.gz when it could (presumably) just as easily be copied into place when automake is first run during the build itself. -- Neil Williams

GPL v3 app with copied GPLv2 or later source and linked against LGPL-2 or later libraries

, into debian/copyright (unless GPLv3 appears in /usr/share/common-licences before gpe-cash is ready for release) and including GPLv3 in the upstream tarball: Copyright Holders: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuCash code in src/objects : (In alphabetical order, using the declarations within the gnucash code