On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:24AM -0500, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
| What is needed here is a license exemption from the freeswan copyright
| holders, granting permission to distribute binaries linked against
| libdes.
Is this enough ? Because of the advertising clause, would Debian be
forced
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 13:23:28 +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Freeswan upstream developers are currently thinking of switch to openssl.
I already pointed out to them that this might need a change in their own
(GPL) license statement so that linking to openssl is explicitly allowed.
Perhaps you
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
The reason why freeswan can currently not go into main is an issue with some
code license that is bundled with it. I am struggling with this for quite
some time now and at the moment I need some help to clarify it
Freeswan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| Which parts of freeswan link against libdes? According to
| /usr/share/doc/freeswan/copyright, some parts are LGPL. Do we know for
| sure that libdes+GPL is happening?
No, not for sure. However, since the copyright situation
Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Freeswan (the user space daemon and the kernel module) needs Eric Young's
libdes to work.
I know from researching for mindterm that version 3.06 of Eric Young's
libdes (from 1993) was licensed under the GPL. I don't know how much the
libdes library has changed since then,
5 matches
Mail list logo
