Re: Status of icons in latex2html

2005-01-28 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi,

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 21:43 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
  So, I would like to ship the icons in the .deb, and repoint the links.
  My problem is: is this legal?  Here is what I think is the relevant part
  of the copyright:
 
  o  Any work distributed or published that in whole or in part
 contains or is a derivative of this software or any part
 thereof is subject to the terms of this agreement. The
 aggregation of another unrelated program with this software
 or its derivative on a volume of storage or distribution
 medium does not bring the other program under the scope
 of these terms.

Please note that the selling clause is the relevant part
(DFSG-incompatible).

 The Latex2HTML maintainer, Roland Stigge, contacted the upstream
 developer of Latex2HTML and his university, both of which indicated they
 would be willing to relicense under the GPL.  If they did so, you would
 clearly have no problem with GPL-compatibility; for that matter, you
 could simply Build-Depends: latex2html and build the documentation in
 the package.  However, upstream stated that they would relicense in the
 next version, which does not seem to have occurred.  I suggest that the
 easiest course of action would be to contact Latex2HTML upstream and
 requesting that he just make a permission statement (via email is fine)
 that grants permission to use Latex2HTML under the GPL.

Since I'm already doing this on a regular basis, other DDs shouldn't do
this in parallel. But it would be nice if others (maybe DDs in mufti)
would ask, too, to show general interest in this question.

Thanks.

bye,
  Roland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Status of icons in latex2html

2005-01-26 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all,

I am packaging clamav, and upstream uses latex2html to generate the html
documentation for it.  The problem is that upstream has not been
including the icons from latex2html in the distributed tarball, breaking
links for users who don't happen to have latex2html installed (the
hyperlinks point to a latex2html install, rather than the same
directory)

So, I would like to ship the icons in the .deb, and repoint the links.
My problem is: is this legal?  Here is what I think is the relevant part
of the copyright:

o  Any work distributed or published that in whole or in part
   contains or is a derivative of this software or any part
   thereof is subject to the terms of this agreement. The
   aggregation of another unrelated program with this software
   or its derivative on a volume of storage or distribution
   medium does not bring the other program under the scope
   of these terms.

Do the icons count as 'contains or is a derivative of this software'?
It might mean yes, but I thought I would solicit suggestions.  It makes
no difference to me - I'll just not ship them if they are non-free; it
saves the postinstall uudecode step as well :)

My fear is that if the rest of the license applies, it appears to be
make it incompatible with the GPL, although I am not sure.

Please cc: me on replies, as I am not subscribed.  Reply-To and M-F-T
set accordingly.

Thanks all,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpdRcsoNAiZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature