Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-23 Thread MJ Ray
Olivier Mascia [EMAIL PROTECTED] First, thanks for your time spent around these questions. [...] Thanks for considering the responses. College, as used here (probably very mistakenly in english), means an =20= implied 'group', a 'collection' of multiple people. The idea is that =20 'Authors'

Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-22 Thread Olivier Mascia
Dear, First, thanks for your time spent around these questions. Please see comments below. Le 20 mars 06 à 03:39, MJ Ray a écrit : Olivier Mascia [EMAIL PROTECTED] MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most of the two above should be in README and AUTHORS, in my opinion. There is no such files with

MIT licenses [was: Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0]

2006-03-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:39:56 + MJ Ray wrote: I think that's the one. There are several often called MIT. Someone has moved the copy on X.org to which http://www.fr.debian.org/legal/licenses/ links - has anyone a new URL besides the failed open source initiative, please? AFAIK, the two

Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-19 Thread Olivier Mascia
Dear all, Le 18 mars 06 à 15:20, Damyan Ivanov a écrit : [META: This is a cross-post to ibpp-discuss and debian-legal. I'd like to give direct discussion a chance, since I am rather busy and can't mediate in a timely fashion] Olivier, below is another comment about the new license. When

Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-19 Thread MJ Ray
Olivier Mascia [EMAIL PROTECTED] MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most of the two above should be in README and AUTHORS, in my opinion. There is no such files with IBPP. Much easier to have everything in a single place. I disagree. The description of the software and the authors will change if

Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-19 Thread Joe Smith
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] The MIT License (in case there would be multiple versions, I'm =20 referring to this one: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-=20 license.html) is indeed very close to the wishes of the IBPP authors. =20= I think

Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0

2006-03-19 Thread Joe Smith
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that's the one. There are several often called MIT. Someone has moved the copy on X.org to which http://www.fr.debian.org/legal/licenses/ links - has anyone a new URL besides the failed open source initiative, please?