At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:46:37 +0100,
Francesco Poli wrote:
I personally think that software solely released under the terms of the
GNU AfferoGPL v3 fails to comply with the DFSG (i.e.: is non-free).
It turns out there is already AGPL software [0] in sid/main as
Miriam Ruiz points out [1] in a
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:20 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out there is already AGPL software [0] in sid/main as
Miriam Ruiz points out [1] in a blog entry.
Does that mean that the question of DFSG freeness of the AGPL of is settled,
at least for the moment?
It means
Hi All;
I have been talking (with the help of Patrick Ohly) to the folks at
Funambol about how the AGPL section 13 (about providing source to
clients [1] ) is meant to apply to e.g. client code.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.funambol.user/905
After some discussion, the FSF
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:59:21 -0400 David Bremner wrote:
Hi All;
Hi!
I have been talking (with the help of Patrick Ohly) to the folks at
Funambol about how the AGPL section 13 (about providing source to
clients [1] ) is meant to apply to e.g. client code.
4 matches
Mail list logo