Re: AGPL3 and client code

2008-11-15 Thread David Bremner
At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:46:37 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: I personally think that software solely released under the terms of the GNU AfferoGPL v3 fails to comply with the DFSG (i.e.: is non-free). It turns out there is already AGPL software [0] in sid/main as Miriam Ruiz points out [1] in a

Re: AGPL3 and client code

2008-11-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:20 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It turns out there is already AGPL software [0] in sid/main as Miriam Ruiz points out [1] in a blog entry. Does that mean that the question of DFSG freeness of the AGPL of is settled, at least for the moment? It means

AGPL3 and client code

2008-11-10 Thread David Bremner
Hi All; I have been talking (with the help of Patrick Ohly) to the folks at Funambol about how the AGPL section 13 (about providing source to clients [1] ) is meant to apply to e.g. client code. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.funambol.user/905 After some discussion, the FSF

Re: AGPL3 and client code

2008-11-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:59:21 -0400 David Bremner wrote: Hi All; Hi! I have been talking (with the help of Patrick Ohly) to the folks at Funambol about how the AGPL section 13 (about providing source to clients [1] ) is meant to apply to e.g. client code.