Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
I've read
the sourceforge's terms of use and got to this paragraph under the
licensing section:
Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is
subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such
subdomain, shall be subject to
En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit:
Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is
subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such
subdomain, shall be subject to the OSI-approved license applicable to
such Source Code, or to such other licensing
Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
That's right, but in this case OSI-approved license applicable to such
Source Code means GPL, AFAIU.
Yes, in this case, the source code is under GPL, but the copyright owner
said nothing about content on webpages.
Of course, they aren't sufficient to grant it.
En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit:
Of course, they aren't sufficient to grant it. But the fact that only
GPL is mentioned, terms of use requiring the same license, alternative
arragements apparently not made... overall they give me the impression
that the artwork may be free enough.
Terms of
Hi.
I've made a modified version of an icon that shows on a sourceforge.net
page (http://timidity.sourceforge.net/). The program is GPL but that
icon isn't distributed with the tarball.
Before bugging again who I suppose is the copyright holder, I've read
the sourceforge's terms of use and got to
5 matches
Mail list logo
