Re: Boost License

2007-06-03 Thread Shriramana Sharma

Michael Poole wrote:

Various boost libraries are already in Debian under this license[1].
Why ask -legal to verify its DFSG freeness?
[1]- 
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/boost/boost_1.33.1-10/libboost-date-time1.33.1.copyright
which mentions many libraries beyond Boost's date_time library


Yes, yes -- how silly. I am running Kubuntu and have boost libraries 
installed. Ergo the Boost license is DFSG-compatible.


I must check if I have rights to modify that wiki, and add the Boost 
license to the approved list.


Shriramana Sharma.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Boost License

2007-05-25 Thread Shriramana Sharma

http://boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt attached.

Please verify DFSG-freeness and add to

http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses

Thank you.

Shriramana Sharma.

Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or organization
obtaining a copy of the software and accompanying documentation covered by
this license (the Software) to use, reproduce, display, distribute,
execute, and transmit the Software, and to prepare derivative works of the
Software, and to permit third-parties to whom the Software is furnished to
do so, all subject to the following:

The copyright notices in the Software and this entire statement, including
the above license grant, this restriction and the following disclaimer,
must be included in all copies of the Software, in whole or in part, and
all derivative works of the Software, unless such copies or derivative
works are solely in the form of machine-executable object code generated by
a source language processor.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OR ANYONE DISTRIBUTING THE SOFTWARE BE LIABLE
FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.


Re: Boost License

2007-05-25 Thread Michael Poole
Shriramana Sharma writes:

 http://boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt attached.

 Please verify DFSG-freeness and add to

 http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses

 Thank you.

 Shriramana Sharma.

 Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003

 Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or organization
 obtaining a copy of the software and accompanying documentation covered by
 this license (the Software) to use, reproduce, display, distribute,
 execute, and transmit the Software, and to prepare derivative works of the
 Software, and to permit third-parties to whom the Software is furnished to
 do so, all subject to the following:

 The copyright notices in the Software and this entire statement, including
 the above license grant, this restriction and the following disclaimer,
 must be included in all copies of the Software, in whole or in part, and
 all derivative works of the Software, unless such copies or derivative
 works are solely in the form of machine-executable object code generated by
 a source language processor.

 THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
 IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
 FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
 SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OR ANYONE DISTRIBUTING THE SOFTWARE BE LIABLE
 FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
 ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
 DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

This is almost a word-for-word copy of the MIT license.  The
differences look to me like improvements and clarifications, with no
impact on DFSG conformance.

Various boost libraries are already in Debian under this license[1].
Why ask -legal to verify its DFSG freeness?

[1]- 
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/boost/boost_1.33.1-10/libboost-date-time1.33.1.copyright
which mentions many libraries beyond Boost's date_time library

Michael Poole


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]